KSA Shark ©

How to accommodate Smit, Bismarck

Written by Andre Bosch (KSA Shark ©)

Posted in :In the news, Springboks on 29 Jul 2008 at 11:52

Is it time for the robust Bismarck du Plessis to be a permanent fixture at hooker for the Springboks?

With the introduction of the ELVs, rugby has changed in its nature from being a game for all sizes to becoming one where even the biggest men on the field have to be athletic.

Ashfak Mohamed writers in the Cape times that Du Plessis was in superb form during the away leg of the Tri-Nations. He was outstanding in all the facets of the game against the All Blacks, before being suspended for the Wallaby Test after an apparent eye-gouging incident involving New Zealand blindside flank Adam Thomson.

Du Plessis carried the ball with conviction, almost always getting over the advantage line. His lineout throwing was for the most part accurate, while his work rate off the ball, as well as his tackling rate, was very high.

The Sharks strongman also showed another skill when he stole a few balls at the breakdowns, which indicated that he could be an extra loose forward.

Du Plessis was severely missed against the Wallabies, where his confrontational approach and ability to clean out at the breakdowns would have kept the likes of George Smith and Rocky Elsom busy.

His ball-carrying ability would also have given the Boks some much-needed momentum against an Australian side that were dominating the tackle area.

But if you’re choking on your sandwich, I am not saying that John Smit should be dropped! I think that Smit can be accommodated at tighthead prop.

His captaincy skills have been well documented, while his rapport with the players on and off the field is excellent. He is well respected by his peers, which is one of the main reasons why Bok coach Peter de Villiers, who also holds him in high regard, decided to keep Smit on as Bok captain this season.

Smit often played tighthead prop for his French club, Clermont, earlier this year. And with the ELVs demanding more athletic players in every position, Smit’s years as a hooker will make him a very mobile prop.

Smit is a strong scrummager as well, while, if need be, he could even continue throwing in at the lineouts if there are concerns about Du Plessis’s throwing ability. I think the move would also prolong Smit’s career, as props can generally play well into their 30s.

Remember too that Smit started his rugby career at prop. He played at loosehead when he captained the SA under-21 side to world championship glory in Argentina in 1999 under the coaching of Eric Sauls. Hanyani Shimange was the starting hooker in that side.

But he then changed to hooker the following year, when he made his Springbok debut. He has on occasion moved to tighthead for the Sharks and the Boks over the last few years.

Following this plan would also resolve the Sharks’ potential problem now that they have again signed Smit from Clermont.

Du Plessis surely cannot still be on the bench for the Sharks any longer, as he had to wait several years before he could even be the first-choice hooker for his province.

Starting with Du Plessis and moving Smit to prop would also allow a dynamic impact player such as the speedy Schalk Brits to come into the equation.

There may have been doubts about Du Plessis’s ability and his temperament up to now, but despite the suspension, I think he has proven that he has overcome those problems and that he has matured enough to be in the starting line-up.


  • A Cape writer writing about a Shark player? And giving him credit?

  • Comment 1, posted at 29.07.08 12:01:01 by molly Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner Author
    mollySuper Rugby player
  • Maybe Bis is coming to the Cape…

  • Comment 2, posted at 29.07.08 12:01:46 by molly Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner Author
    mollySuper Rugby player
  • @molly (Comment 2) :

    No they get extra points in the CT media awards if they “write” a NON-WP player into the Bok squad. :wink:

  • Comment 3, posted at 29.07.08 12:10:10 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©Head Coach
  • Molly, and not any Cape writer but their answer to JJ Harmse. While I was reading this I was wondering what was wrong that this guy would write Bismarck up and not Schalk Britz and then lo and behold up pops Britz on the reserve bench in the second last paragraph. :twisted:

  • Comment 4, posted at 29.07.08 12:12:35 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the SubtleAssistant coach
  • So Smit should play tighthead & throw in at the line outs? Maybe he should take the goal kicks as well. :wink:

  • Comment 5, posted at 29.07.08 12:12:51 by ra-cheltjie de' be-er Reply

    McLovinAssistant coach
  • Seriously though, I think John must stay exactly where he is as Bismarck as his back-up.

    It will PUT super heavy pressure on the Bok captain if a player of Smit’s stature is in the side and not captaining it. (And I am afraid the wet from the Bulls can’t handle the pressue as a captain already and will wilt even further under such stress.

    Once we have a decent replacement as leader (JdV) and Smit is no longer up to it then drop him from the team.

    As much as I rate the guy I feel he has to be in the side as captain or not in the side at all.

  • Comment 6, posted at 29.07.08 12:13:49 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©Head Coach
  • And unfortunately Brits is not a test quality hooker.

  • Comment 7, posted at 29.07.08 12:14:08 by ra-cheltjie de' be-er Reply

    McLovinAssistant coach
  • @ra-cheltjie de’ be-er (Comment 5) :

    John of all trades!! :mrgreen:

  • Comment 8, posted at 29.07.08 12:15:31 by I'ce (Rebel With a Cause) Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    IceAssistant coach
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 4) : Even though you get bonus points for writing up a non wp player, you lose points should you not at least mention the equivalent wp player as 2nd best or just as good. :wink:

  • Comment 9, posted at 29.07.08 12:17:52 by ra-cheltjie de' be-er Reply

    McLovinAssistant coach
  • @I’ce (Rebel With a Cause) (Comment 8) : :grin:

  • Comment 10, posted at 29.07.08 12:19:06 by ra-cheltjie de' be-er Reply

    McLovinAssistant coach
  • @ra-cheltjie de’ be-er (Comment 7) :

    Glad that PdV also thinks so, coz now the guys who have been nailing Jake White for not selecting Brits have no option but to eat their words.

    I wonder if Brits is still so happy about not accepting Jake’s “offer” :wink:

    He played himself from the supposed #1 choice to a definite 4th choice at best in one game.

  • Comment 11, posted at 29.07.08 12:19:08 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©Head Coach
  • @ra-cheltjie de’ be-er (Comment 9) : :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

  • Comment 12, posted at 29.07.08 12:19:42 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©Head Coach
  • We don’t need him Molly.

    We’ve got Brits (who can play 8th man) and we’ve got Shimmie who is a Bok.

    And we let that overrated Tiaan Liebenberg go which was a good thing… (NOT) :roll:

  • Comment 13, posted at 29.07.08 12:31:33 by wpw Reply
    wpwAssistant coach
  • @KSA Shark © (Comment 11) : He’s not good enough at scrum time (at test level imo) & his line out throwing is simply not good enough. Considering how important line outs are to the Boks, we cannot afford to have the likes of him throwing in.

  • Comment 14, posted at 29.07.08 12:32:45 by ra-cheltjie de' be-er Reply

    McLovinAssistant coach
  • @ra-cheltjie de’ be-er (Comment 14) :


  • Comment 15, posted at 29.07.08 12:39:48 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©Head Coach

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.