Comments on: Shall we Build?

By: Farlington

Farlington — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:36:48 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 65) : I agree... The problem at the tank can not be put onto one person. I think RS should also be held accountable and hopefully everybody has learnt a very expensive lesson. Local youth is the way to go. Support them and they will become loyal servants to the team.

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:32:08 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 70) : he has played two games for sharks xv hasn't he?

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:25:37 +0000

@try time (Comment 69) : Maybe he is not 100% fit…Dunno

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:22:37 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 66) : why is ludik sitting in sa?

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:21:47 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 63) : none at all, he puts in an order form and gets declined stamped on it.

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:17:26 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 66) : Backline players that can run with the ball, especially front foot ball seems usually happy, ask me…

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:16:29 +0000

Honestly I think The Sharks just need to get rid of the kicking game especially Oupa Stef

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:14:30 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 63) : @try time (Comment 64) : Lack of communication...the downfall of many...

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:10:40 +0000

i think adolf should get the boot before plum, for not getting the depth right at crucial positions.

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:10:15 +0000

@try time (Comment 61) : Plum also have a say in the buying of players or don't he ?

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:09:14 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 58) : i don't think there is a game plan because there has been no flyhalf.

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:08:02 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 56) : i think the biggest problem has been the flyhalf cock up. you buy an expensive argie who then ducks. you have already promised ruan he will go back to scrummie. so you run around and find a new guy, who retires twoa days before the first game. so you rush in plan b, who has a shocker because the team hadn't trained around him. then you throw in the tiger woods of rugby and he is showing no interest in playing flyhalf anymore. so now you are in kak. you get a pom and now centres and scrummie have to learn the new combination. can you really put blame on plums shoulders? his forward pack is doing well considering the extra work they have to do because the backline is a mess and they kick everything away.

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:04:18 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 59) : Would help if it’s in small print on the contract

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:03:46 +0000

@try time (Comment 57) : Part of the package it seems…

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:02:37 +0000

@try time (Comment 55) : He has been overhauled by a game plan that’s killing his natural game…

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:02:24 +0000

you are damned if you do and you are damned if you don’t. if plum puts faith in players, they don’t deliver. he is a bad coach. he drops those “stars” and the youngster has a nightmare. he is a bad coach. thankless job.

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:00:26 +0000

@try time (Comment 53) : Can be, but what are they trained, that they’re not interested in following Plum’s “gameplan”

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:59:38 +0000

for example, how many times does jp have to be reconditioned?

By: Charlie

Charlie — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:58:25 +0000

@try time (Comment 51) : Maybe, maybe not, only time will tell...

By: try time

try time — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:57:54 +0000

@Charlie (Comment 47) : the players have admitted they aren't playing what they trained. i am sure rory admitted this in his greenaway interview. so is plum to blame because certain players are choking under pressure. he is to blame if they don't get dropped this week.