KSA Shark ©

The Erasmi shrug off SANZAR rejection.


Written by Andre Bosch (KSA Shark ©)

Posted in :In the news on 26 Jul 2010 at 19:24
Tagged with : , , , , , , ,

Organisers of a proposed Twenty20-style rugby competition have vowed to continue with their plans to stage the tournament despite failing to attract the support of SANZAR.

Scrum.com reports that International Super Rugby, the brainchild of former Springbok Rassie Erasmus and South African lawyer Frikkie Erasmus, has been styled on cricket’s Indian Premier League with eight privately owned franchises competing for a lucrative cash prize. The format, set to debut in January 2012, would see matches with two 20-minute halves and amended rules to discourage kicking while it is hoped the scheduling, at a time normally reserved for conditioning ahead of the Super Rugby season, would ensure the participation of the game’s biggest names.

The promoters recently met with officials of SANZAR, the umbrella body representing the national unions of South Africa, New Zealand and Australia, to outline their plans but failed to secure their backing with a statement citing an ‘overwhelmingly negative’ response from Super Rugby stakeholders.

However, speaking exclusively to ESPN Scrum, Frikkie Erasmus has dismissed the SANZAR rejection insisting that the presentation was a mere courtesy and their approval for the tournament was not required as it would feature, “a different code of rugby which does not fall under the jurisdiction.”

“It was clear to me that they felt threatened by our format and were not supportive of the idea,” Erasmus said of his meetings with Australian Rugby Union chief John O’Neill and his New Zealand counterpart Steve Tew that followed an earlier meeting with South African Rugby Union president Oregan Hoskins. “It therefore came as no surprise when they decided not to support it. As explained to them when I met with them, it was out of courtesy and not because their consents are required. It is a different code of rugby which does not fall under the jurisdiction of SANZAR or the IRB.”

Erasmus’ attempts to sell the perceived positives for Super Rugby fell on deaf ears but he insists the financial rewards available in the competition would help retain top players and prevent a talent drain to the northern hemisphere as well as keep players sharp in the off-season.

“We will continue with our plans to host the tournament. We believe that rugby needs an exciting format of this nature,” added Erasmus. “Cricket’s governing body had a problem initially with the IPL but in the end it succeeded and it is now a roaring success. There are just so many positives, that it is a great pity that a few individuals want to deprive the players of this opportunity.”

Erasmus is confident player power and the support of sponsors will see the tournament come to fruition with the first competition set to benefit from the talent overhaul in the wake of Rugby World Cup 2011.

“In terms of player participation, there basically are two categories,” explains the former Stormers’ commercial manager. “The first category comprises those players who will retire from rugby after next year’s World Cup and who will therefore not fall under the jurisdiction of any governing body and there are quite a large number of these top name players.

“The second category is those players that come out of contract with their unions, provinces and clubs at the end of the World Cup. When they negotiate renewal of their contracts, they will do so on the basis that they exclude the three week ISR (International Super Rugby) tournament period during January 2012, and the subsequent years. They will therefore be non-contract players for the three week period and/or have prior approval to take part.

“There will no doubt be severe player and player union pressure for the tournament to happen.”

A bullish Erasmus also questioned the comments made by Tew, who is also the chief executive of SANZAR. “He said that the feedback from SANZAR’s Super 14 teams was overwhelmingly negative but it would be interesting to know which teams were consulted, and in what manner. On checking with certain unions, it was denied that there was a discussion or even a request for feedback. And was full and unbiased information provided to those that were consulted?”

He also took Tew to task on the issue of player welfare – insisting that the tournament would not have a detrimental effect on the fitness of those taking part. “This aspect has been thoroughly researched and also discussed with the players themselves and with fitness and conditioning experts,” added Erasmus.

“January is the month dedicated to fitness and conditioning preparation and for playing warm-up games. The physical activity during the tournament is less than that of the Super 14 preparation and warm-up games, because of the shortened format, extra subs and rule adjustments. It is in fact an ideal way of conditioning, according to the players and other fitness/conditioning specialists who are probably better equipped to decide, rather than the three SANZAR executives who decided on the players’ behalf.”



6 Comments

  • the competition would help retain top players and prevent a talent drain to the northern hemisphere as well as keep players sharp in the off-season.

    Yes and when will their off season be then????????? When they retire?

    You guys are fools for trying to launch this and if you DO get it off the ground don’t be surprised to the the S15 unions prevent their players from playing thus killing the competition in its infancy.

  • Comment 1, posted at 26.07.10 19:27:54 by KSA Shark © Reply
    KSA Shark ©Head Coach
     
  • When they negotiate renewal of their contracts, they will do so on the basis that they exclude the three week ISR (International Super Rugby) tournament period during January 2012, and the subsequent years.

    Yeah right any of the S15 unions will allow their players to be “off” for three weeks during the primary conditioning and training phase 3 weeks before their S15 season kicks off???????????

    This will be nothing more than a competition of has beens.

    Oh and i can only GUESS which lawyer will be doing their negotiating.

  • Comment 2, posted at 26.07.10 19:31:57 by KSA Shark © Reply
    KSA Shark ©Head Coach
     
  • Its all about the benjamin$ baby!! :grin:

  • Comment 3, posted at 26.07.10 19:37:47 by wpw Reply
    Administrator
    wpwAssistant coach
     
  • Erasmi…LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:

  • Comment 4, posted at 26.07.10 21:44:58 by klempie Reply

    klempieTeam captain
     
  • I’m with SANZAR :twisted: There’s more than enough Rugga allready.

  • Comment 5, posted at 27.07.10 07:06:48 by Jarson Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonXAssistant coach
     
  • Well I support anything that goes against IRB and SANZAR.
    I am tired of the IRB old farts, and tired of Aus running SANZAR, and South Africans paying for it. That is total bull. We as South Africans should be making the calls as we are World Champions, and also majority income to SANZAR.

    This said I do believe the new Super 15 is flat, and will prove to be, will also get worse as they try add more and more teams to the system.
    I also agree that there is way to much rugby at the moment and that they should make the competitions smaller and not bigger.

  • Comment 6, posted at 27.07.10 14:08:30 by Uli Reply
    Valued Sharksworld Supporter
    Uli BoelieSuper Rugby player
     

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.