Dire Sharks missed Barritt

Written by Rob Otto (robdylan)

Posted in :Currie Cup, In the news, Sharks on 29 Jun 2008 at 21:26

There was an acceptance among the dejected Sharks on Friday night that they had taken a step backwards in their match against Boland after having finished strongly against Western Province the week before.

There was also an acknowledgment that the 10 minutes of “proper” rugby that was good enough to put daylight between them and the Cavaliers will hardly be sufficient against the Bulls this week in Pretoria, writes Mike Greenaway for IOL.

The Cavaliers are renowned for their ability to make life difficult for “A” section provinces, but only if they are allowed to, and that is what will have annoyed the Sharks’ coaching staff most.

In the first half especially, the Sharks recklessly or negligently turned over the ball almost every time they go it, and that allowed the young Boland team to get their tails up.

The Sharks got better shape when John Plumtree made a number of substitutions early in the second half, including swapping the more experienced Monty Dumond for rookie Andrew Borgen at flyhalf and Skipper Badenhorst for Craig Burden at hooker, but the im-provement in play could have been coincidental with the generally uplifted team effort.

“In fairness to Borgen, we were so poor it was hard for him to look good,” Plumtree said.

“When Monty came on we started to play better as a team, but there are a lot of guys in the side who need to look at themselves in the mirror now.

“We also needed the kicks that Monty made after Rory Kockott went off with an ankle injury.”

The influential Kockott is likely to be sidelined for at least a week with his sprained ankle, but young Charl Macleod looks very promising.

Borgen and Dumond got their opportunities because Bradley Barritt failed a late fitness test on a quadricep injury. Plans were for him to play flyhalf until Frederic Michalak is fit in about three weeks time.

“We missed Brad Barritt tonight in terms of his direction and leadership,” Plumtree said. “He is a big player for us, he should be back this week.”

In mitigation for the Sharks, the Cavaliers played very well and it is probably a good thing that the home side have had a wake-up call.

“Boland came here for a real scrap,” Plumtree said. “There are graveyards all over South Africa laid by the smaller unions and sometimes they visit you in the mood to bury you. They had nothing to lose and showed total commitment.”

Which was not the case for the Sharks.

“We had the firepower for this game, but not the commitment,” Plumtree said with finality.

1 Comment

  • I wonder if the Nay Sayers (about using Barrit at Flyhalf) are now all going to be more polite. From the day his name was first mentioned as a prospect I have been led to believe he is hugely talented. I have been out of SA for 7 years so have never been able to really sit down and have a heart to heart with fellow Sharks supporting mates, so have had to use all of you as my source of info.Can’t imagine my newfound Crusader supporter friends really being interested in discussing the Sharks talent pool.I do feel sorry for Barrit as he is just been used as a Stop Gap (until Michalak arrives. What worries me is we only really have Barrit and Pienaar as cover for next Super14 or are we hoping Steyn is our saviour at flyhalf. Poor Pienaar is going to be used as a utility by the Boks so lots of Bench time, so he isn’t going to have any opportunities in cementing his flyhalf or scrumhalf skills.

  • Comment 1, posted at 29.06.08 23:28:00 by Dynamite Reply

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.