KSA Shark ©

Aus v SA 2nd ODI – (Aus win by 5 runs)


Written by Andre Bosch (KSA Shark ©)

Posted in :In the news on 18 Jan 2009 at 08:12
Tagged with :

SA got themselves into a good position only to lose a few wickets and are now under pressure to score 10 an Over for 6 overs.

JP Duminy and Boucher are at the crease on 190/ 5 chasing 249.


50 Comments

  • thanks for the update.

  • Comment 1, posted at 18.01.09 08:13:39 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • Okay we have started a new thread by request from the 3G users. 😉

    SA need 56 off 5 Overs with Duminy at bat and Boucher at bedside.

  • Comment 2, posted at 18.01.09 08:13:47 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • Duminy FOUR!!!!!!!

  • Comment 3, posted at 18.01.09 08:16:04 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • That four brings up the 200 for SA after 45,5 Overs

  • Comment 4, posted at 18.01.09 08:16:37 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • 8 runs off the last over

    48 needed off 4 overs

    202/5

  • Comment 5, posted at 18.01.09 08:17:34 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • Much better. Well the new thread, the cricket’s not looking too good. We need Lance out there.

  • Comment 6, posted at 18.01.09 08:18:36 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • Current partnership 30 runs, 5.0 overs, RR: 6.00 (Boucher 7, Duminy 21)

    Boucher seems to be having a Sunday morning snooze not realising he is in Aus and it is early evening

  • Comment 7, posted at 18.01.09 08:18:53 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • Hpw many has Bracken got left?

  • Comment 8, posted at 18.01.09 08:19:14 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • who invented dstv compact and who would buy the dumb thing

  • Comment 9, posted at 18.01.09 08:19:25 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • @klempie (Comment 6) :

    We just need a wicket keeper batsmen who isn’t collecting leather jackets. 😉

  • Comment 10, posted at 18.01.09 08:19:42 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • @PJLD (Comment 9) :

    Not sure about the inventor, but It sounds like you may be using one at the moment. 😉

  • Comment 11, posted at 18.01.09 08:20:39 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • F*cking stupid. I think there are too many too get now.

  • Comment 12, posted at 18.01.09 08:20:47 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    46.5 Bracken to Duminy, OUT, so well bowled, and the frustration results in a run out! Bracken fires in yet another mesmeric yorker, which Duminy fails to pick, he sets out of his crease and pays the price as Haddin knocks down the stumps with an accurate throw
    JP Duminy run out 35 (57m 34b 3×4 0x6) SR: 102.94

  • Comment 13, posted at 18.01.09 08:22:30 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • @PJLD (Comment 9) : Yeh it’s pretty kak.

  • Comment 14, posted at 18.01.09 08:22:45 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • @KSA Shark © (Comment 11) :damn stupid holiday house

  • Comment 15, posted at 18.01.09 08:23:05 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • 46.6 Bracken to Morkel, FOUR, thats the way to go, leaning into a wider one and picking the gap at point

    I hope Boucher saw that!

    No need to be playing test cricket in an ODI!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Comment 16, posted at 18.01.09 08:23:42 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • Decent over this for us. Bouch is looking a bit freer.

  • Comment 17, posted at 18.01.09 08:24:53 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • @KSA Shark © (Comment 13) :bouch is doing pissall so thats the game i guess

  • Comment 18, posted at 18.01.09 08:24:55 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • @KSA Shark © (Comment 16) :

    It seems Boucher DID see that

    47.2 Hilfenhaus to Boucher, FOUR, swings at a low full toss and picks the gap behind square leg
    47.1 Hilfenhaus to Boucher, 2 runs, pitched up in the slot, Boucher clears the leg and goes over mid-on

  • Comment 19, posted at 18.01.09 08:25:29 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • @PJLD (Comment 18) : HAHA! He just scored 14 in 5 balls. 😆

  • Comment 20, posted at 18.01.09 08:26:05 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • bout time mark

  • Comment 21, posted at 18.01.09 08:26:29 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • @klempie (Comment 20) : 😆 sorry bouch

  • Comment 22, posted at 18.01.09 08:27:41 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • 2 4 2 4 2 1

    ALL from Boucher. Maybe Albie told him to “Hey Word Wakker die dag lyk al hoe [email protected]

  • Comment 23, posted at 18.01.09 08:28:14 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • This over is key. Albie MUST put Bracken away.

  • Comment 24, posted at 18.01.09 08:28:20 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • 26 runs needed off 2 overs

  • Comment 25, posted at 18.01.09 08:29:18 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • a 6 needed now.

  • Comment 26, posted at 18.01.09 08:29:26 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • Oh cool. Hilfenhaus is bowling the last over. Evens things out a bit. 😎

  • Comment 27, posted at 18.01.09 08:30:49 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • 48.4 Bracken to Morkel, FOUR

    Why can’t anyone else do that?????????????

  • Comment 28, posted at 18.01.09 08:31:05 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • 17 Runs needed off the last over.

    This if gonna be goooooooooood.

  • Comment 29, posted at 18.01.09 08:31:47 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • Damn. Bouch is facing the first ball. No PP either. We need a three off the first ball.

  • Comment 30, posted at 18.01.09 08:32:05 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • That’s the game I think.

  • Comment 31, posted at 18.01.09 08:33:19 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • 2 Runs from Boucher off the first ball.

    We need more than that.

  • Comment 32, posted at 18.01.09 08:33:22 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • 6

  • Comment 33, posted at 18.01.09 08:33:37 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • BOUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHH!!!! SIIIIIIXXXX!!!!

  • Comment 34, posted at 18.01.09 08:33:48 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • Dot ball

    15 needed off 4 balls. 😡

  • Comment 35, posted at 18.01.09 08:33:56 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • SIX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Comment 36, posted at 18.01.09 08:34:23 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • It’s all up to Albie.

  • Comment 37, posted at 18.01.09 08:34:28 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • 9 needed off three balls. 🙂

  • Comment 38, posted at 18.01.09 08:34:49 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • this is cricket

  • Comment 39, posted at 18.01.09 08:35:33 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • 8 needed off two

  • Comment 40, posted at 18.01.09 08:35:47 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • Damn. 🙁 Can only tie it.

  • Comment 41, posted at 18.01.09 08:36:30 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • ok im going drinking

  • Comment 42, posted at 18.01.09 08:36:36 by PJLD Reply
    Administrator
    Clayton(PJLD)
     
  • What is taking so long is Ponting having a a BBQ?????

  • Comment 43, posted at 18.01.09 08:36:56 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • Bit of a flat finish. Oh well.

  • Comment 44, posted at 18.01.09 08:38:09 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • 2 runs off the last two balls.

    Aus win by 5 Runs 🙁

  • Comment 45, posted at 18.01.09 08:39:17 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • @PJLD (Comment 42) : It’s 8:30! 😯

  • Comment 46, posted at 18.01.09 08:40:10 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • Boucher should have woken up a few overs earlier. 👿

  • Comment 47, posted at 18.01.09 08:40:22 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • I’m off. Ciao KSA.

  • Comment 48, posted at 18.01.09 08:44:24 by klempie Reply

    klempie
     
  • Cheers.

    let me get some work done here as well. 😥

  • Comment 49, posted at 18.01.09 08:57:22 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • No cricket thread… 🙄
    What’s happening at Cricketworld? 🙂

  • Comment 50, posted at 23.01.09 07:32:13 by blckshrk - PROTEAS Reply

    blackshark - I'm back!
     

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.