wpw

Div’s call to you


Written by Wesley Weber (wpw)

Posted in :Bulls, In the news, Super 14 on 21 May 2009 at 07:01
Tagged with : , , , , , , ,

Sport24.co.za reports that Springbok coach Peter de Villiers and other rugby greats feel that all South Africans should support the Bulls against the Crusaders in the Super 14 semi-final at Loftus.

“I give the Bulls a 75 percent chance of winning,” said De Villiers.

“I think their recipe for success this year has been their faith in themselves and the fact that they have faith in each other. They know they can win.

“It’s our duty to support the Bulls after everything they’ve achieved,” he said, referring to his decision not to include the Bulls players in the Bok squad who will be playing a Namibian team in Windhoek on Friday.

“The Bulls are most important right now and that gave our Bok coaching team the opportunity to delve a little deeper.”

The ex-Springbok prop, Os du Randt, thinks the Bulls have a good chance of beating the New Zealanders.

“The Bulls can definitely win against the Crusaders. If they can neutralise Richie McCaw with an aggressive yet controlled approach, it will boost their chances even further.

“The 50 000 or so supporters will also make things difficult for the Kiwis.”

Ollie le Roux, a former South African prop, seems more certain about a Bulls’ victory.

“The Bulls are the favourites by far, especially if one takes into account how well Fourie du Preez and Morné Steyn are playing.

“They can place their opponents under extreme pressure with tactical kicking.”

A former Bok coach, André Markgraaff agrees. “I think Du Preez and Steyn’s kicking will be the determining factor. They put serious pressure on their opponents.

The Crusaders will thus also try to put pressure on the Bulls right from the start, but I don’t think they have the mettle to win at Loftus.”

There was a word of caution that came from Carel du Plessis, another former Bok coach.

He feels the Bulls can’t afford to relax when they play the Super 14 defending champions.

“The Bulls have a strong pack which has laid the foundation for several victories. The Crusaders are a cunning team, but they’re missing several key players.”

Du Plessis said, “the thousands of local supporters at Loftus will certainly be a factor, but the Bulls will have to maintain the intensity they’ve demonstrated during this season when they face the Crusaders.”


106 Comments

  • Ons bloed is blou!!! 😕

  • Comment 1, posted at 21.05.09 07:07:51 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @wpw (Comment 1) : not mine, but good luck to them.

  • Comment 2, posted at 21.05.09 07:41:28 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • @wpw (Comment 1) : Jy ‘n draadsitter ❓ , eers Stormers, toe Sharks nou Bulle :mrgreen:

  • Comment 3, posted at 21.05.09 07:45:01 by Charlie Reply

    Charlie
     
  • @Charlie (Comment 3) : if Wes decides to support a team, they lose. I’m glad he’s behind the bulls 🙂

  • Comment 4, posted at 21.05.09 07:52:10 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @robdylan (Comment 4) :

    Hey!!! 👿

  • Comment 5, posted at 21.05.09 07:59:00 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • I wouldn’t be particularly upset if the Bulls win this one and then lose at home to the Chiefs in the final. They might know what it means when someone pees on your parade, winning a game they ordinarily would have no right to!

  • Comment 6, posted at 21.05.09 08:23:49 by Baldrick Reply

    Baldrick
     
  • @Baldrick (Comment 6) : bitter bitter bitter, could that relate to a certain final some years ago?? 😀

  • Comment 7, posted at 21.05.09 08:41:18 by Whindy Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner
    Whindy
     
  • South Africa First…..GOOOOOOO BUUUUUUULLLLLSSSS 😎

  • Comment 8, posted at 21.05.09 08:41:47 by Pokkel Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Author
     
  • @Whindy (Comment 7) : exactly it wasn’t the Bulls fault that they won that final…blame Steve Walsh, blame Frans Steyn…but you can’t blame the bulls for playing to the final wistle. 🙄

  • Comment 9, posted at 21.05.09 08:44:31 by Pokkel Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Author
     
  • @Whindy (Comment 7) : Yes!

    I just don’t like the Bulls at all. I will almost without doubt support a local team against overseas opposition, unless their win would be detrimental to the Sharks efforts.

    The Stormers in particular come to mind, and I don’t feel heart sore watching them lose either to be brutally honest – except if it hurts the Sharks.

    Dude, it’s all about the Sharks. Why must I support someone else?

    Oh, good news, JP Nel’s appeal was thrown out. Is he dangerous AND stupid enough to think he could get out of that?

    Idjit!

  • Comment 10, posted at 21.05.09 08:44:51 by Baldrick Reply

    Baldrick
     
  • I despise the Bulls and their supporters as much as anyone BUT they are a South African team which means I will support them against the New Zealanders.

    Baldrick

    Would you support the Boks if there was not ONE Sharks player in the side and it was full of WP and Bulls players???

  • Comment 11, posted at 21.05.09 08:45:09 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @Baldrick (Comment 10) : Could be worse I am a long suffering Lions fan, at least your boys keep you happy most of the time

  • Comment 12, posted at 21.05.09 08:46:37 by Whindy Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner
    Whindy
     
  • Har har har…

  • Comment 13, posted at 21.05.09 08:47:52 by Big Fish Reply
    Author
    Big Fish
     
  • GO Crusaders!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😈 😈 😈 😈

  • Comment 14, posted at 21.05.09 08:51:21 by Reds Reply

    Reds
     
  • @Whindy (Comment 12) :

    If you call ONE trophy in 12 years success dan weet ek darem nie.

  • Comment 15, posted at 21.05.09 08:52:18 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • I have a funny feeling that the chiefs are going to collapse against the Hurricanes then we can all support the Bulls next week. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

  • Comment 16, posted at 21.05.09 08:52:21 by Whindy Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner
    Whindy
     
  • “winning a game they ordinarily would have no right to!”

    One would hope that was written in jest….. 😯

    I have to say i will be supporting the Bulls, rather by design than want, much like i would be supporting the Sharks if they were in a simialr position…

  • Comment 17, posted at 21.05.09 08:56:33 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • @Whindy (Comment 16) : I have a feeling the Chiefs will be S14 champs this year!!Go Crusaders!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Comment 18, posted at 21.05.09 08:56:43 by Reds Reply

    Reds
     
  • @wpw (Comment 15) : At least the Lions have won a super title which is more than a certain side in the south can brag about, there best chance was staffed up because they were to busy striking!! 😆

  • Comment 19, posted at 21.05.09 08:57:24 by Whindy Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner
    Whindy
     
  • @wpw (Comment 15) : WP are not better – we haven’t one anything since 2001. And that was the Currie Cup which is about to become obsolete.

  • Comment 20, posted at 21.05.09 08:57:55 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • @Reds (Comment 18) : If the Crusaders beat the Bulls which I doubt , I would then put my money on them

  • Comment 21, posted at 21.05.09 08:58:57 by Whindy Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner
    Whindy
     
  • @Whindy (Comment 21) : Nah i think its the Chiefs year….

  • Comment 22, posted at 21.05.09 09:03:38 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • i want a chiefs win. they have played the best rugby all season. so go crusaders. they will then have to fly to hamilton and should lose the final due to fatigue. up the saders, up yours bulls.

  • Comment 23, posted at 21.05.09 09:05:31 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @wpw (Comment 11) : I would support them, but if the sharks were playing at the same time, I’d watch the Sharks game!

  • Comment 24, posted at 21.05.09 09:05:51 by Baldrick Reply

    Baldrick
     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 20) :

    I know WP are useless but that’s not the point is it?

    I know this is a Sharks website but for goodness sake, posting articles about going all the way when the competition was not even halfway.

    Then there was the one about going unbeaten on the overseas leg only to lose to the Reds. :mrgreen: 😆

  • Comment 25, posted at 21.05.09 09:06:15 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @wpw (Comment 25) : So what you are saying they are actually just like the Bulls , they just dress differently 😆

  • Comment 26, posted at 21.05.09 09:07:16 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • @wpw (Comment 5) : you’ll never walk alone, Wes! 🙂

  • Comment 27, posted at 21.05.09 09:07:18 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 17) : There were too many questionable incidents in that game. Decent quality refereeing and TJing would have earned us a different result

  • Comment 28, posted at 21.05.09 09:07:58 by Baldrick Reply

    Baldrick
     
  • Good call PdeV… support the Bulls.
    Now do the right thing and get your fellow Western Cape citizens to support SA / The Stormers against New Zealand teams.

  • Comment 29, posted at 21.05.09 09:09:39 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Baldrick (Comment 28) :
    So the Sharks have never won a game via a “dubious” decision?

    Sorry mate the only reason you didn’t win…you can’t seem to kick the ball out – Steyn in that game, Oom Stefan in the game that sent you packing this year…

    I would say its more your own failures rather than someone elses doing 😆

  • Comment 30, posted at 21.05.09 09:13:39 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • @robdylan (Comment 27) :

    DAMN!! 👿

    You know me too well Robbo!!! 😉

  • Comment 31, posted at 21.05.09 09:19:04 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • “A former Bok coach, André Markgraaff agrees”

    Eish how this dude still gets a look in the local game is beyond me. Kind of like a certain ex-coach who runs recruiting at the Sharks.

  • Comment 32, posted at 21.05.09 09:20:37 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 32) : you obviously are using the phrase coach loosely. 😆

  • Comment 33, posted at 21.05.09 09:24:19 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 32) :

    Adolf?? 😕

  • Comment 34, posted at 21.05.09 09:27:10 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 30) : Agreed there, we made mistakes ourselves, but reverse matters and it makes a lot of difference. Or remove poor options and we would have won.

    Still, that’s neither here nor there, my point is I don’t like the Bulls for a range of reasons, and thus see no reason to support them.

    I don’t know that winning the S14 has any effect on the 3N. We won the RWC in 2007, but I think that had more to do with a 4 year play of JWs rather than the Bulls and Sharks being in the S14 final.

    (In the 2007 Tri Nations, we came stone last, 1 win out of 4!). So support who you like, it doesn’t have an effect!

  • Comment 35, posted at 21.05.09 09:30:17 by Baldrick Reply

    Baldrick
     
  • @try time (history forgets losers) (Comment 33) : 😆 indeed

    @wpw (Comment 34) : ?!

    @Baldrick (Comment 35) : Each to their own i guess.

  • Comment 36, posted at 21.05.09 09:33:49 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • @Baldrick (Comment 35) : IN 2004 SA won the 3N. All three sides won 2 games, we earned more BPs.

    S12 form – Stormers – losing semifinalists – were the best SA side

    IN 1998 SA won 3N – Sharks were the best SA side, again, losing semifinalists. Stormers finished 9th, Bulls 11 and Cats 12.

  • Comment 37, posted at 21.05.09 09:33:52 by Baldrick Reply

    Baldrick
     
  • @Baldrick (Comment 35) : and eddie jones.

  • Comment 38, posted at 21.05.09 09:35:46 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 36) :

    He is referred to as Adolf and not Rudolph. 😀

  • Comment 39, posted at 21.05.09 09:39:39 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 30) :
    Not kicking the ball out was 1 reason, not the ONLY one.
    @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 32) :
    Considering where the Sharks were before Straueli came on board and where they have gone to since – including coaching, medical and player personell and facilities, then I’m more than happy with what he has been doing.
    You WP guys obviously see it in a different light and are just as happy with your lot.

  • Comment 40, posted at 21.05.09 09:51:21 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 40) : Salmo, I honestly don’t know where I stand on Rudi at the moment. I keep hearing that players think he gives them a raw deal… then again, I reckon a lot of the players give him (and the rest of the management and fans) a raw deal too…

  • Comment 41, posted at 21.05.09 10:00:24 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 40) : But it was the one that made the difference – wasn’t it.

    No – i just never forgave him for the fiasco he made of 2003

    As to the WP fellows…they lost my support this season. No more season tickets. no more nada from me. To much bullshit and zero improvement in 9 years.

  • Comment 42, posted at 21.05.09 10:05:57 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 40) : yeah as a stormers supporter i would be more peed off than a sharks supporter as they have the players that don’t play to their potentual. but i am not a stormers supporter so i don’t care. i do care when we were short of players when the injuries hit, and that is adolfs fault. he is supposed to make sure we have sufficient strength in key areas. we never had any decent replacements for deysel or ruan (and thank goodness stefan never got injured). and please don’t tell me frans was a decent replacement.

  • Comment 43, posted at 21.05.09 10:12:40 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @robdylan (Comment 41) :
    If they are getting a raw deal then they should rather look at their agents than blame Strauli. I cant imagine that he would have too much to do with them (other than admin wise) after they have arrived at the Sharks. He might be an abrasive hard arsed customer (Im not saying he is) but ultimately that is what is probably what is requireed when dealing with agents who probably have bigger egos than those they represent.
    To me the Shark tank is a much better place with Strauli than it was prior to his involvement. Simplistic, but I dont have any other way to measure his influence.

  • Comment 44, posted at 21.05.09 10:13:23 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @try time (history forgets losers) (Comment 43) : this brings up an interesting question though. why does the sharks have such a high injury rate at flyhalf? compared to other s14 teams we go through a lot of flyhalves. de waal, grant, morne, even pretorius (and look at the overseas team the picture is the same)never had an injury as far as recall. yet as far back as i can remember the sharks have had an injury to a flyhalf. butch, spooner, ruan, fred, brown all went down with injuries. do we put too much on our flyhalves shoulders? or are we buying wimps? or are we not protecting our flyhalves? it is an interesting puzzle.

  • Comment 45, posted at 21.05.09 10:26:27 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @try time (history forgets losers) (Comment 45) : add honiball to the list.

  • Comment 46, posted at 21.05.09 10:27:31 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @try time (history forgets losers) (Comment 43) :
    I hear what you are saying, but where are these replacements meant to come from. They would surely not come from one of the run on 15 frfom one of the other Super 14 teams as those guys would rather be run on players for any team than playing Vodacom Cup and/or sitting on the bench for ,posssibly, the entire campaign. Would any one have an aadequate replacement for Deysel but maybe if we had shown more faith in some of our bigger, ball carrying Vodacom Cup flanks then the difference would not have been so tangabble, replace like with like.
    As for Ruan, maybe Dummond could have had a look in and Steyn kept at centre but I think it was natural that they would have shifted Steyn to flyhalf.
    “(and thank goodness stefan never got injured).” 😯 ❓ ❓ are you feeling OK, been drinking from the fountain of happiness again then.
    BTW I am miffed that Stefan is not getting a look in against the Lions, he deserves it.

  • Comment 47, posted at 21.05.09 10:31:57 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @try time (history forgets losers) (Comment 45) : SPOONER?

  • Comment 48, posted at 21.05.09 10:33:27 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 44) : look – the only agent I have spoken to personally reckons Strools is actually a pleasure to work with.

  • Comment 49, posted at 21.05.09 10:34:46 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • Honnibal was no wimp – look for other reasons for him.

  • Comment 50, posted at 21.05.09 10:35:27 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 47) : you are right, Sammy… Strools can’t be expected to do more than to ensure the likes of Downey, Rhodes, etc stay in the system. If the coach refuses to pick them, that’s not his fault.

  • Comment 51, posted at 21.05.09 10:38:12 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • BTW, speaking of flyhalves, where are the other ones we’re meant to have contracted?

    Snagging Francois Steyn was actually a master-stroke – it’s just a little unfortunate that he hasn’t really delivered on his schoolboy pedigree – particularly not at flyhalf.

  • Comment 52, posted at 21.05.09 10:43:05 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 47) : i decided to give stefan a break. i think plumtrees gameplan, messed stefan up. after the last game it looks like it was plums gp to kick possession away. either that or stefan just woke up.

    i also don’t care where we get backup from and whether they have to sit on the bench, we need backup. monty is poor and is not a s14 player. too much was put on ruans shoulders. you could see on tour with ross going as backup. ruan was the scrummie backup and flyhalf. this is daft. also would you rather play in the cheetahs lions or stormers and end last on the log, or play for a team that is a final contender, even if it means you get a little bench time?

    if it isn’t adolfs fault then it has to be plums for not getting potentual future stars proper training. there are too many questions about how things are done at the sharks, and it is usually the players that take the flack.

  • Comment 53, posted at 21.05.09 10:45:35 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 50) : exactly my point, why do the sharks have a poor injury record with flyhalves?

  • Comment 54, posted at 21.05.09 10:47:11 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @robdylan (Comment 51) :
    Thanks, after that long,(for me), post I forgot to state that maybe the coaches should have been willing to show more faith in those that are in the system.

  • Comment 55, posted at 21.05.09 10:58:30 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 55) : i agree, plum drained his players by not using his bench effectively. how many times did he still have players sitting on the bench at full time.

  • Comment 56, posted at 21.05.09 11:07:45 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • @try time (history forgets losers) (Comment 53) : time for a little investigative journalism?

  • Comment 57, posted at 21.05.09 11:08:32 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 55) : it’s kinda ironic… a while ago, I wrote an article about how useless it was for the Bulls to contract every young player under the sun when they never entrusted them with gametime in the senior side.

    Seems the Sharks are even worse when it comes to that.

  • Comment 58, posted at 21.05.09 11:13:45 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @try time (history forgets losers) (Comment 53) :
    Ross Cronje selection ahead of McCloud is baffeling and I think you have read it right that Ruan was always going to be the miracle man. Monty may not set the world alight but would he really have been such a huge liability with Steyn playing alongside him, especially if the instruction was to hoof the ball at all opportunities.
    I think many players would rather get regular game time than sit on the bench, even if it is in a batteling team. As a proffessional its important that they remain match sharp and get maximum exposure.

  • Comment 59, posted at 21.05.09 11:21:29 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @wpw (Comment 1) :

    Jou oog gaan F%^&en blou wees as hulle jou by Loftus vang met ‘n WP Trui aan. 😛

  • Comment 60, posted at 21.05.09 11:26:57 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • @KSA Shark © (Comment 60) : 😆

    Better yet – arrive in a Wp jersey and then take it off to reveal a Saders jersey…just make sure your insurance is in order 😀

  • Comment 61, posted at 21.05.09 11:38:14 by Worcestershire Sauce Reply
    Author
    Worcestershire Sauce
     
  • I have a vivid image of Andrew Mehrtens turning and giving the Loftus crowd, what amounted to, an up yours after a successful kick to win the game off the last play at Loftus. The Loftus crowd was incensed.

  • Comment 62, posted at 21.05.09 11:47:11 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 61) :

    Hehehehehhe 😆 😆

  • Comment 63, posted at 21.05.09 11:48:16 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • @Worcestershire Sauce (Comment 61) :

    or just to make SURE you get bliksemed, take the WP jersey off to reveal an All Black jersey. 😛

  • Comment 64, posted at 21.05.09 11:49:04 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 62) :

    He even had to go and apologise if i rememebr correctly. 😆

  • Comment 65, posted at 21.05.09 11:49:55 by KSA Shark © Reply

    KSA Shark ©
     
  • @KSA Shark © (Comment 65) :
    Dont remember that, do remember that he was on @##^^^*&% HAPPY.

  • Comment 66, posted at 21.05.09 11:56:36 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • Namibian Invitation XV – 15 Jaco van der Westhuyzen, 14 Tonderai Chavhanga, 13 Frikkie Welsh, 12 Meyer Bosman, 11 Llewellyn Winckler, 10 Derick Hougaard, 9 Rory Kockott, 8 Jacques Burger, 7 Duane Vermeulen, 6 Jacques Nieuwenhuis, 5 Nico Breedt, 4 David de Villiers, 3 Kobus Calldo, 2 Richardt Strauss, 1 Kees Lensing (c).
    Subs: 16 Hugo Horn, 17 Johnny Redelinghuys, 18 Ruan Vermeulen, 19 Anton van Zyl, 20 Wayne Julies, 21 Jurie van Tonder, 22 Chrysander Botha.

  • Comment 67, posted at 21.05.09 12:08:03 by Charlie Reply

    Charlie
     
  • @Charlie (Comment 67) :

    Some decent players in that team.

  • Comment 68, posted at 21.05.09 12:18:14 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @Charlie (Comment 67) :

    Ah now that allows some other contenders to have a last minute effort for green and gold…..why is the name Namibia involved in the whole thing? They should have just made it a Bok trial match.

  • Comment 69, posted at 21.05.09 12:24:30 by Dive Pass Reply

    Dive Pass
     
  • I see Rob’s favourite player is captaining the side… 😎

  • Comment 70, posted at 21.05.09 12:32:40 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @wpw (Comment 70) : useless… at least it will be a good opportunity for John Smit to destroy a supposedly good loosehead

  • Comment 71, posted at 21.05.09 12:52:27 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 59) : but if you are wise and you want to last, you do what albert does and come off the bench. he has added 5 years at least to his carreer. but i hear what you are saying.

  • Comment 72, posted at 21.05.09 12:55:01 by try time (history forgets losers) Reply

     
  • Say, WHAT??, Uncle Piet?? 😯

    yeah….riiiggghhhtttt 🙄 😉

  • Comment 73, posted at 21.05.09 12:58:50 by Prof. Ice Reply
    Competition Winner Ice
     
  • I’ll go as far as wishing them luck… I don’t know about sitting there and cheering for them Mr De Villiers.

  • Comment 74, posted at 21.05.09 13:04:27 by blackshark Reply

    blackshark - I'm back!
     
  • @blackshark (Comment 74) :

    With you on that…but I am also gonna wish the Crusaders luck… 😈

  • Comment 75, posted at 21.05.09 13:16:39 by Prof. Ice Reply
    Competition Winner Ice
     
  • Nope I am with Baldrick! Infact I got worried reading Baldrick’s comments I thought I was writing without even Knowing it 😯

  • Comment 76, posted at 21.05.09 13:23:38 by Sharksmad - The Blog's Dudette Reply

    Sharksmad - The Blog's Dudette
     
  • that’s a tuffy – i do not want kiwies to win but i do not like bulls either.
    fortunately the nationality argument does not apply to me :mrgreen:

  • Comment 77, posted at 21.05.09 16:22:06 by rekinek Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner Author
    rekinek
     
  • @rekinek (Comment 77) : does either of the teams have even one player wiht Polish heritage?

  • Comment 78, posted at 21.05.09 16:34:14 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @rekinek (Comment 77) : how did it come that you support the sharks

  • Comment 79, posted at 21.05.09 16:37:20 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • @robdylan (Comment 78) : doesn’t look like. all Poles must be in France then or busy doing movies –
    i’ve noticed that in practically every movie when they have the names at the end – there is always a Polish one.

  • Comment 80, posted at 21.05.09 16:43:57 by rekinek Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner Author
    rekinek
     
  • @JarsonX (Comment 79) : i like to suffer :mrgreen:

    seriously though the other half grew up in natal – so for the sake of home peace could not do any other team.

  • Comment 81, posted at 21.05.09 16:46:05 by rekinek Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition Winner Author
    rekinek
     
  • @rekinek (Comment 80) : well, at least the Sharks have one 🙂

  • Comment 82, posted at 21.05.09 16:57:13 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @rekinek (Comment 81) :
    Doe the other half post here?

  • Comment 83, posted at 21.05.09 17:05:49 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @rekinek (Comment 81) : im sure she’s the better half :mrgreen: she’s a shark supporter so she must be

  • Comment 84, posted at 21.05.09 17:15:39 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 83) : if he doesn’t, he’d better start!

  • Comment 85, posted at 21.05.09 17:17:14 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • btw i picked both the bullies and chieftains to win by 7 points 😛 i have a good feeling about it 😉

  • Comment 86, posted at 21.05.09 17:18:47 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • @robdylan (Comment 85) : is it a he or she 😳 what about rekinek?

  • Comment 87, posted at 21.05.09 17:20:16 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • @JarsonX (Comment 84) : @robdylan (Comment 85) : he/ she ❓

  • Comment 88, posted at 21.05.09 17:21:19 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 88) : maybe they are both ‘its’ 🙄

  • Comment 89, posted at 21.05.09 17:23:50 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • why cant i see if im online or not 😛

  • Comment 90, posted at 21.05.09 17:25:34 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • Ok, on that point Im off to find myself.
    A good eveniung to all.

  • Comment 91, posted at 21.05.09 17:28:01 by Salmonoid Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Salmonoid (Comment 91) : well enjoy, i think we will never know the truth :mrgreen:

  • Comment 92, posted at 21.05.09 17:35:00 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • I thought you all knew rekinek was a girl?

  • Comment 93, posted at 21.05.09 17:54:17 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • 😯

  • Comment 94, posted at 21.05.09 18:52:37 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @robdylan (Comment 93) : NO!! 😯 Serious? 😕

  • Comment 95, posted at 21.05.09 19:16:03 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • @JarsonX (Comment 95) :
    Don’t get any ideas bru… 😉

  • Comment 96, posted at 21.05.09 19:31:24 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • REKINEK…. Dude 😳 Dudette, im so sorry for thinking you are a guy all this time, my sincere appologies 🙂 no wheres that blushing smiley

  • Comment 97, posted at 21.05.09 19:35:43 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • @wpw (Comment 96) : you, me, salmonoid and who else thought she was a man 😈 :mrgreen:

  • Comment 98, posted at 21.05.09 19:37:27 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • oops. Hope it wasn’t meant to be a secret

  • Comment 99, posted at 21.05.09 19:39:09 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • After a long debate with myself- I have decided to support and cheer for the BULLS. Screw New Zealand! BULLE!

  • Comment 100, posted at 22.05.09 07:22:52 by blackshark Reply

    blackshark - I'm back!
     
  • @blackshark (Comment 100) : 😯

  • Comment 101, posted at 22.05.09 07:40:55 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @wpw (Comment 101) :

    It’s Nkosi sikelel’ i-Afrika…
    NOT Nkosi sikelel’ i- New zealand… 😆

  • Comment 102, posted at 22.05.09 09:06:31 by blackshark Reply

    blackshark - I'm back!
     
  • @blackshark (Comment 102) : i concur 😀

  • Comment 103, posted at 22.05.09 09:15:11 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     
  • @blackshark (Comment 102) :

    Try telling that to Rob, Baldrick and the PHAT lady!! 😈

  • Comment 104, posted at 22.05.09 09:21:10 by wpw Reply
    Author
    wpw
     
  • @wpw (Comment 104) :

    Ja well – I also thought it was impossible but after some rational thinking…it makes sense to go with the BULLE!

    I mean , I already cheer for half the squad when they wear Bok colours.
    It hurts that the Sharks didn’t make it – but I’m not gonna let that mess up MY brain. The Bulls are flying the RSA flag. BLOU!

  • Comment 105, posted at 22.05.09 09:27:43 by blackshark Reply

    blackshark - I'm back!
     
  • from comment 79

  • Comment 106, posted at 22.05.09 14:13:48 by JarsonX Reply
    Competition WinnerCompetition WinnerCompetition Winner
    JarsonX
     

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.