The Sharks team to face Griquas at Absa Stadium Durban on Friday night, has been announced.
There are a few changes to the team that beat WP so comprehensively on Saturday. Injuries and Springbok call up have forced John Plumtree to play Monty Dumond at fullback, as Louis Ludik will not be risked against Griquas this weekend. Andries Strauss has recovered from leaving the field early against WP, to take his place in the starting line up.
With the call up of Ryan Kankowski to the Springbok setup, the loose trio has reverted to the Daniel, Alberts and Botes look. The tight five is unchanged.
On the bench we have backup in Anton Bresler and Michael Rhodes, after Ross Skeate injured himself in the gym. We also see the return to first class rugby of Andre Pretorius, who comes onto the bench and will hopefully see a few minutes towards the end of the game.
Full team:
15. Monty Dumond
14. Odwa Ndungane
13. Stefan Terblanche (Captain)
12. Andries Strauss
11. Lwazi Mvovo
10. Patrick Lambie
9. Charl McLeod
8. Keegan Daniel
7. Willem Alberts
6. Jacques Botes
5. Alistair Hargreaves
4. Steven Sykes
3. Wiehahn Herbst
2. Bismarck du Plessis
1. Tendai Mtawarira
Replacements
16. Craig Burden
17. Eugene van Staden
18. Anton Bresler
19. Michael Rhodes
20. Rory Kockott
21. Andre Pretorius
22.Riaan Swanepoel

Andre Pretorius ๐ฏ Geefis, why`s this game not televised?
PETOORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
‘We also see the return to first class rugby of Andre Pretorius, who comes onto the bench and will hopefully see a few minutes towards the end of the game.’ No we won’t because the supersport is televising the game ๐ฟ
Weakest Sharks team for a couple of weeks but should still comfortably beat the kwasse
Haha we gonna klap the Griquas, they are really gonna see their gat ๐
@VanWilder (Comment 1) : still cant imagine petoors in a sharks jersey!!!!
anyone gonna be there with a weedeeo kammeraaa?
just worried about dumond at fullback… how did he play last week at fullback?
you guys know that MyPooh is still training with the Sharks? I’ve seen pictures…
@robdylan (Comment 8) : oh nice!! maybe top management is negotiating his “transfer”, or i hope so…
@robdylan (Comment 6) : @robdylan (Comment 8) : You might want to go see a doctor soon… ๐
@robdylan (Comment 8) : maybe we should try and facebook him for the latest news? ๐
The Griekwas team shouldn’t trouble this Sharks outfit, but I would have felt happier with Stefan going back to fullback, starting Swanepoel at outside centre and moving monty back to the bench.
Otherwise this team looks about right.
@Pokkel (Comment 3) :
I will report back honestly about how he played..
@VanWilder (Comment 7) : akkerig! @robdylan (Comment 8) : ne??
Awesome team!
I’m glad Plum’s playing Keegan at 8.
Isn’t being on the bench going to hurt Andre’s buttocks again?
@VanWilder (Comment 7) : Not too flash, unfortunately. One horrible sliced kick put us under pressure, but then again, he wasn’t on for long, so difficult to judge his general form.
@rhineshark (Comment 15) : yes, wanted to mention that. A very astute selection to put him at 8 and Willie at 7. This is a freakishly good loose trio
Personally would’ve picked Terblanche at 15, Strauss at 13 and Swanepoel at 12. Thought I saw Andre Pretprius at the Pro Shop sale in Johannesburg yesterday, anyone know if he’s moved to Durban or if he’s still commuting ?
@VanWilder (Comment 11) : good luck with that ๐ It’s like trying to get blood from a stone
@tallchap (Comment 19) : nah, he’s been living in Durbs for months
@rhineshark (Comment 17) : eish, just hope that they leave Lambie at fly, and dont rotate him back to fullback again… sure it will be a good move, but i think we should leave lambie in 1 position now…
@rhineshark (Comment 15) : Seems like Alberts have slipped behind Daniel as a number 8. Almost as if they have swapped positions.
@jonnow (Comment 12) : I’m pondering Swannie at 13. Not a huge amount of gas, but he’s been pretty effective as a strike runner the last few weeks. 12 doesn’t suit him unless you have a real playmaker at 10.
Oh wait… ๐
@tallchap (Comment 19) : strauss in no outside centre, i would have picked the same just with piet lindeque in the 13 jersey
@VanWilder (Comment 22) : Lambi must stay at 10 – maybe move to 12, but only in a crisis.
@robdylan (Comment 20) : or you can just mail Plum?
๐
@Jarson:
Real possibility that. That guy has a gift of finding ways to get injured.
@war1 (Comment 25) : oh, how we could have used mapoe at 13 at the moment hey?? ๐
@VanWilder (Comment 29) : i would not play mapoe at 13, he’s a wing. I was thinking we need adi back
@robdylan (Comment 24) : if we had jpp, we could have moved ndungane to 15 and jpp to wing. where is vulindlu?
@war1 (Comment 30) : agree that mapoe is a wing, but he played pretty well there for the cheetahs before getting injured… Adi is overrated ๐ (how long before we get a reply from charlie??) ๐
@robdylan (Comment 6) : Me…I’ll try to get some highlights of the game for you…like I did last time.
@VanWilder (Comment 7) : he wasnt bad, personally I would have preferred Terblanche at the back with the U21 centre starting… But hey, Dumond will be adequate…
@VanWilder (Comment 31) : i think he’s playing club… just back from a knee injury
@Letgo (Comment 33) : had you in mind, but can never find your email address ๐
Do you want a sharksworld one, btw? And when are you going to join our podcast?
@VanWilder (Comment 27) : I doubt he’d reply.
@war1 – I agree with you on that, thing is that we’ve then got 2 relatively solid lads protecting that centre channel and with Lambie showing to be creative and Stefan cutting into the line, perhaps not a bad option. But hey, Piet Lindeque is a good option, then you have either Dries or Riaan providing the experience from 12.
Dumond is good, just think we can do better …
@robdylan (Comment 35) :
Did you see that Mostert is playing club rugby as well?
@Richard Ferguson (Comment 39) : yes. Pity for Bresler, cos I’m sure mossie will come back in soon.
I think they’ll actually look at Mossie as a blindside flank option… he could be amazing there as cover for Deysel and Alberts.
i`m just worried that we will be over confident… remember what happened against the pumas? griquas not a bad side. we should take this one, but give this guys a finger and they will rip your arm off…
@tallchap (Comment 38) : dumond will do a good job tomorrow, I have no doubt about that
@Richard Ferguson (Comment 39) : for how long has he been playing club rugby now?
@robdylan (Comment 40) :
I thought he was a flanker.. so you say he is a lock?
It is going to get tough for Plum to select a team if all these guys are fit and and the Boks are back..
Great loosies in Daniel, Kanko, Deysel, Alberts, Rhodes, Botes, Mostert… jeez..
@VanWilder (Comment 43) :
I think 2 weeks now.. Im not 100% sure..
@war1 – Lets hope he does, will be interested to, cause if it works, just gives us more options.
@robdylan – Does Andre have a contract then ?
I would have loved to see what Alberts could have done for the Boks at 8 on saturday.
@Richard Ferguson (Comment 44) : its nice to have a bit of depth in our side again… and with the u/21`s perfoming so well, it just adds to that. ๐
@tallchap (Comment 46) : It could be a PAYG contract because he is way too injury prone to sign long term.
@lostfish (Comment 49) : I think that’s exactly what it is. He’s going to get match fees and that’s it
@robdylan (Comment 36) : Cool, now I’ll definitely have to do it.
I didn’t know I can have a sharksworld email adress, I wouldn’t mind having one of those.
I thought the podcast was just for all the really smart guys on the site. ๐
How do I join?
@Letgo (Comment 51) :
Hey.. I’m in the podcast.. I’m far from smart..
@robdylan (Comment 50) : I tried to find you on Skype…if you want e-mail me your skype address
Pokkel, seeing as you just became an author… should I add you to the authors list?
Letgo, I take it you aren’t on the authors list either? Or else you would know!
Both of you please send me an email quickly… [email protected]
Plum must just keep in mind that Petoors can pick-up a injury for sitting to long on the bench, early changes on the cards ๐
@Charlie (Comment 55) : Or pick up an infection from the splinters…
@lostfish (Comment 56) : bwaaaaa ๐ he does have sensitive buttocks ๐
seeing Pretoors in black and white .. nah .. can’t warm myself to this idea at all. ๐
@robdylan (Comment 6) : yes please. you must not miss the moment when AP inkjures himslef.
i know I am being mean ๐ but serias.
@lostfish (Comment 49) :
BTW : Rob – what happened with Mostert – is he over the injury.
@rekinek (back to rugby) (Comment 58) : well, let’s wait until he starts scoring some points for us… then that might change.
I’m ambivalent about it. I don’t feel we really need him, but it is kind of comforting to see his name on the bench this week.
@robdylan (Comment 62) : monty can kick as well.
no comforting feeling at all. as you said – don’t really need him.
@rekinek (back to rugby) (Comment 61) : it sounds like it. He’s apparently playing club rugby
@rekinek (back to rugby) (Comment 58) : It will be very strange to see him in black and white rather than red and white. Same with Bosman but I do think that black and white is better for a ginger than orange.
@robdylan (Comment 64) : wonder whether demotion or getting over the injury.
@robdylan (Comment 62) : It can’t hurt to have him if he is fit as long as we are not relying on him as the first choice. He also has a lot of experience to impart to the younger guys and he was a pretty decent flyhalf when he wasn’t being hampered by injuries.
@lostfish (Comment 65) : ๐ฏ
Supersport telling me to go stuff myself after I dared to complain about their lack of Sharks coverage this weekend:
Good day Mr. Botes,
SuperSport has a commercial arrangement with SA Rugby to broadcast three of every four Currie Cup matches every weekend, with one match on Friday and two on Saturday. This broadcasting schedule is done when the fixtures are out before the tournament starts.
SuperSport will always endeavour to get the bigger matches/derbies onto live TV. SuperSport will also try and ensure an even spread of fixtures across all the unions in terms of the TV coverage as per our contract. We have broadcasted the Natal Sharks union more than any other union so far this month. Please also bear in mind that the difficulty with broadcasting every fixture, apart from budget constraints, is that some games kick-off at the same time as others and there is a lack of capacity on SuperSportโs channels to broadcast all the rugby live coupled with other sports that we also do live production hence stretching the OB resources.
Thank you
๐ ๐
@rekinek (back to rugby) (Comment 66) : getting over the injury. And who do you drop?
@lostfish (Comment 67) : Pretorius showed in the recent pre-season game against the Force that he’s still a very good flyhalf.
@Original Log Leader (Comment 69) : so the real problem is SuperSport and SARU not talking to each other…
@robdylan (Comment 71) : Well Rob I tried. I don`t buy that ” not enough channels ” bit though. . .
Wanna see what I asked them?
“Stefan to fullback, stefan to fullback!!!”
I know, let’s have a strike and go and chase all the Sharks Management out of their offices!
@Original Log Leader (Comment 72) : sure ๐
@robdylan (Comment 74) :
Those are serious loyalty points……just when I was eyeing a Top 20 spot……. never mind there is always 2047 ! lol
I’ll start giving points for other stuff ๐
@robdylan (Comment 74) : My question for Supersport :
I`m very disappointed to see you won`t be televising the Sharks game this weekend. You have so many sport channels available that shouldn`t be an issue. But broadcasting relative nobodies like the Pumas instead of two teams who are currently in the top four? It`s not as if the match is in the bush somewhere, surely you have a broadcasting station / bus right at the Shark Tank? I`m sure if you asked your subscribers which game they would rather watch it won`t be the Pumas. . .
@Original Log Leader (Comment 77) : Sounds like they gave you the standard “brush off”… It’s definitely got bugger all to do with the number of channels, because they have plenty and they’re showing “filler” crap on most of them at that time anyway. I hate it that they dare insult our intelligence with such an answer. Rather don’t give any answer, but don’t insult my intelligence!!
They must be getting the Top 14 at a real discount that they’d rather show that than the Sharks game!
So good for the “client is always right”… you don’t get that much anymore these days!
I reckon it’s more to do with the point that they try and be equitable with each of the 8 teams over the season… but why be equitable when there’s way more Sharks supporters than Pumas supporters!
@CS (Comment 78) : Maybe Div is their CEO
@CS (Comment 78) : The Pumas are playing the Bulls…that’s the team you should focus on here, but this is only the second game of the Sharks that is not being broad casted this season, so I don’t think we’re specifically seeing less games of the Sharks being broad casted. I just think super sport makes a pretty poor selection of which games to air.
The Griquas Bulls game should have been aired.
Last weekend and this weekend they are only broadcasting two of the games.
So this guy basically told you, it’s because Supersport wants to save some money. Nice, tell a costumer, our bank account is more important than you. You have to keep the costumer happy.
Suppersport has to much of a monopoly on sport broadcasting in SA. Someone needs to start their own channel dedicated to rugby spesifically, and with better commentators and sharksworlders as the match analysts.
BTW…Dumond at 15, one of Plumtree’s worst decisions of the season. I know it’s the save and I guess obvious option, but I really think he could have used this opportunity to give a youngster a chance.
@Letgo (Comment 80) : i think the problem is to give ALL 8 teams the chance to play on the telly. otherwise the leopards and pumas would rarely get a chance.
and to add to the bulls pumas clash, its played at the new soccer stadium, i guess they are expecting a “bigger” crowd for that one…
@Letgo (Comment 81) : who would you have picked at 15? Wynand Pienaar?
@VanWilder (Comment 82) : I think they should air all of them. It doesn’t have to be live, if they feel there is some other live event that could rather be aired at that time, but they should at least broad cast it at some point. If I turn on Supersport 1 at any given point during the week, I’d have a 25% chance of seeing Boots & All. Do they really need to show it that many times? Air the other games later during the weekend!
Also if you had to choose, then the teams at the top of the log should get preference. If you win you get rewarded with air time, if you lose, you don’t.
@robdylan (Comment 83) : Yes…I think it’s worth a shot, or I would have shifted Stefan to 15 and put Lindeque or one of the other promising centers at 13. But I guess this is the safe choice and since Ludik will probably be back at 15 next week and the other player would have to make way again it’s probably best to select from the current squad…
I retract my comment, it’s probably not one of the worst decisions he has made, now that I think of it, it actually makes sense…. ๐ฏ
How did you do that?
@robdylan (Comment 83) : Rather play Lindeque at 13 and Oupa at 15.
@Letgo (Comment 85) : unintentionally, to be honest ๐
see the latest thread for changes. Hargreaves is out
Andre pretorius??? ๐ฅ I thought the Sharks had managed to get rid of the medical retirement case
NEWSFLASH! Apparently Bees Roux has just been arrested for beating a guy to death! ๐ฏ
@robdylan (Comment 87) : I would still have like to see lindeque at 13 or Pienaar at 15, but I can see why Plum didn’t do it. Worst decision was a little harsh, I get a little dramatic sometimes.
@Ice (Comment 90) :
the dead guy is Metro Policeman. ๐
@Ice (Comment 90) : for allegedly …
๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 92) : ๐
@Ice (Comment 90) : AHA ! This should weaken their side a bit more . . . ๐
@rekinek (back to rugby) (Comment 93) :
alledgedly..
@Ice (Comment 90) : ๐ฏ
They say he’s still playing on friday?
@Original Log Leader (Comment 94) : eish Pierre… that’s a little off-colour, don’t you think?
More than rugby at stake here…
@robdylan (Comment 98) :
I need to have a word with you….go and see my comment on the Frans Steyn thread.. ๐ฟ
@Letgo (Comment 97) : Who Bees Roux? He wasn’t in the squad to start with?
That is hectic! It all sounds really dodgy at this stage – early hours of Friday morning, police officer dies of extnesive injuries…
http://www.timeslive.co.za/sport/rugby/article625201.ece/Bulls-player-beats-policeman-to-death–reports
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 100) : I’m sorry…I completely miss read the last column of that article. They said that Roux is a bulls player and that the Bulls are playing the Pumas tonight. My bad.
let’s just all remember the concept of “innocent until proven guilty” here, guys.
We need to use the word “allegedly” at all times.
@robdylan (Comment 103) :
I did fix it with my next comment… ๐
@Ice (Comment 104) : good, good ๐
@Ice (Comment 90) : @KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 92) : @robdylan (Comment 103) :
So we’re allowed to speak about rugby players killing public servants but we’re not allowed to speak about public servants killing rugby?
You SW admins are loons of the highest order. ๐
@klempie (Comment 106) :
Dude you been hanging behind the boerewors curtain for to long. ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 107) : ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 107) : Be honest, you can’t fault my logic. ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 107) : actually, you are spot on. Klemps needs to move away from Tshwane. He is clearly keeping bad company and they are addling his brain ๐
There, there, Klemps. We still like you. Kind of.
@klempie (Comment 106) :
Dude you’ve just pissed me off Big time.
WTF does a player allegedly killing an individual have to do with politics?
I swear you lurk in the hope that there will be a small morsel dropped for you to latch onto somewhere that will allow you to try and attack the no politics policy of the site??????????
@robdylan (Comment 110) : ๐
@robdylan (Comment 110) :
I will still like you…kind off
if you go and investigate my case….
Morning all. Bad news about Hargreaves but the Sharks should still take it.
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 111) : Because we all know that discussions of crime in this country lead inexorably to discussions of politics. That’s why.
@Pokkel (Comment 114) : Where did the extra star come from I thought I was still a couple hundred comments away? Does this mean I can play Super 15 now??
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 111) : PS. I was kidding about SW admins being loons.
My point still stands though.
@klempie (Comment 115) :
On this site, ONLY when you are around. ๐ฟ
A rugby player allegedly killed a policeman, sad for rugby, sad for the family of the victim, sad for the family of the suspect, but absolutely NOTHING to do with politics or a general discussion of crime.
Our posters, (well most of them) are mature enough to know not to bring irrelevant subjects up on Sharksworld.
@Pokkel (Comment 116) : Rob’s given us all loyalty points so welcome to the club…although I also would like to know if we were all given the same points or if they were weighted according to our loyalty or existing points. ๐
@klempie (Comment 119) : I’d be surprised if you got any extra points ๐
@Pokkel (Comment 116) :
DONT you even mention STARS…Rob is avoiding me like hell! I am running after him on the blerrie site, but he slides like a mouse with slippers….I will catch him though! ๐ฟ
@klempie (Comment 117) :
Calling me a loon is something i have no issue with, you know me well enough to know that I take the piss out of myself often enough not to care if someone calls me a name in jest or in ernest.
I have issue with you constantly raising the site policy when a half chance presents itself.
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 118) : And 49 other South Africans (including cops) will also sadly be reported murdered today. Is the only reason we’re not discussing them because rugby players weren’t involved?
@Ice (Comment 121) : Do you think you deserve your platinum star?
@Pokkel (Comment 120) : They might get confiscated after my last infringement. ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 122) : I had actually only just signed on when I posted….
@Pokkel (Comment 124) :
Yes I do! Dont you agree? But I think because we are woman, we should get a Diamond for our contribution.. ๐ A 0.1 carat up to a 5 carat!
wooooah . slow down peeps. KSA, I’m with you on that point, but let’s rather take it up with Klempie offline. Maintaining decorum at all costs, that’s my way.
Ice – I’m not bright enough to have figured out what you’re on about! Can you spell it out for me?
Pokkel, you got a 4k loyalty bonus for being with us for two years. Well done!
@klempie (Comment 123) :
Yes!!!!!!!!! Which part of that is difficult to understand?
We aren’t asking you to agree with it we are asking you to abide by it.
the points worked like this:
if you registered in 2008 and posted a comment of any sort in 2008, you got 2000 points
if you registered in 2009 or before and posted a comment of any sort in 2009, you got 2000 points.
So anyone who has been with us since the start – and still active – got 4000. And will get 2000 more at the end of this year.
@robdylan (Comment 128) :
I also need a loyalty bonus – I have been here from the START!! And I am sure I have made the most comments AND contributions (female)… ๐ ๐
@robdylan (Comment 128) :
If I had access to my email I would. ๐
How much of a loyalty bonus did I get, I didn’t notice any change. ๐
@klempie (Comment 123) : jeez, how doff are you? There are thousands of other topics that we also don’t discuss because rugby isn’t involved.
Question – do you see a thread about Bees Roux on this site? No, because we wouldn’t carry something like that. It has happened and it is inevitable that it will be mentioned, but we’re not going to emphasise it or dwell on it because it’s just not “our thing”.
@Ice (Comment 131) :
I thought you were all FOR gender equality. ๐
Besides WPW has made more comments than you. ๐
@robdylan (Comment 130) :
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 132) :
Ek ook nie… ๐ฟ ๐
@Ice (Comment 131) : you got one, chick… 4000 points.
@robdylan (Comment 130) :
Oh okay the bonus was so small it was just a ripple on the surface of my overall tally. ๐ ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 134) :
Most of my stuff is original content too – not copy and pastes.. ๐
Oh and as for WES…how many of those made sense anyway?? ๐ ๐
@robdylan (Comment 136) :
But I am still where I was…5 stars…what must I do with 5 stars???
I can confirm that KSA, Ice and everybody else got the correct loyalty bonus! Sheesh.
Just cos i gave you the points doesn’t mean you’re guaranteed to get another star. There ARE no other starst for KSA to get!
@robdylan (Comment 133) : jeez, how doff are you? There are thousands of other topics that we also donโt discuss because rugby isnโt involved.
I don’t think you saw the thrust of my argument. I was pointing out that it’s being discussed because rugby IS involved so why shouldn’t that ethos be carried through to other (far LESS controversial) issues where rugby is involved? Further, crime is a political issue.
I think where my stance is misunderstood with you guys is that I don’t have a problem with a “no politics” policy per se. The problem is you guys can’t define what politics is and what isn’t.
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 137) : That’s what I was getting at in my response to Pokkel. Surely a bonus should be commensurate with the number of points you already had so that you can see the difference?
Rob, what’s your opinion here?
@robdylan (Comment 140) :
What happens when I get o 500k do I get cash. ๐
@Ice (Comment 139) : I’ve looked at the user stats, and I think you have to get 50000 points to get a “platinum” star. You and I should be next. ๐
@klempie (Comment 142) :
I wouldn’t really agree. That would be like giving a 6% increase to ALL employess of a company so therefore the guys earning 20k a month would get much more money that those earning 10k.
So the rich get richer and the poor lag further behind as opposed to everyone get the same monetary increase.
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 145) : Hmmm…yes. I see your point. What about a bonus cap then? ๐
@robdylan (Comment 130) : i was reading in 2008 – can I get a 1000 โ
@klempie (Comment 144) :
you are correct
Academy recruit 0
Under 19 player 250
Under 21 player 1000
Vodacom Cup player 5000
Currie Cup player 10000
Super 14 player 25000
Team captain 50000
Assistant coach 100000
Coach 250000
@rekinek (back to rugby) (Comment 147) :
Were you logged in while you were reading? ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 145) : I would like – since we are on binus discussions – to have another type of icon that I can add above my pic. ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 148) : How the hell you’ve managed to get to coach is beyond me! ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 149) : there was definately a connection – I guess logged in a wider sense of the word could be used to describe it.
so yes. definately ๐
@Ice (Comment 139) : less than 4000 points to your platinum star. That’s doable! Just 40 articles or 800 comments ๐
@klempie (Comment 151) :
34454 Comments (5318 more than the next person) (5319 after this comment)
2643 Articles posted
441965 points scored
THAT is how. ๐
@robdylan (Comment 153) :
Who are we allowed to copy and paste from??
@Ice (Comment 155) : Skryf jou eie goed dammit. ๐
@robdylan (Comment 153) : I’m going to drill her over the next two weeks and get there first! ๐
Right. I am off for some lunch so my favourite admin can have a chance to cool down to a simmer.
Sorry Rob. But KSA just lets me get away with more. ๐ Not today though. ๐
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 154) : Personally I think you’re cooking the books. ๐
@klempie (Comment 158) :
My PC is screwed up. ๐ I’m as calm as a landmine. until you step on me. ๐
Crime is a socio-economic issue, not a political one.
More importantly, I think I should get points for being part of the…
EXODUS!!!
Movement of Jah People…
Pharoah, let my people go… ๐
@klempie (Comment 159) :
The scary thing is that if I knew how to I probably would.
๐
@Big Fish (Comment 161) : Politics governs socio-economics. Saffers know that possibly better than anyone else.
Right I’m deffo off to lunch now.
@Big Fish (Comment 161) : LOL ๐
Hey, there’s a perfectly good Sharks under 21 team announcement article just dying to be written, if anyone wants to do it… I’m supposed to be working
@klempie (Comment 163) : and I govern Sharksworld. With a fist of iron.
In the words of Judge Dredd… “I AM THE LAW”
He he.
I will try to write some stuff after 6 September, which is when I have to hand in 2 assignments. ๐
@robdylan (Comment 165) :
@robdylan (Comment 164) :
DONE!!!
@Big Fish (Comment 166) : What are you studying?
@robdylan (Comment 165) : ๐ฏ *wets himself*
Anyone had the rotisserie chicken legs from Woolies? I highly recommend. YUM!
@klempie
MBA
@Big Fish (Comment 172) : An MBA qualified attorney. You gonna make hobbo’s of cash bru!
I’m a simple man with simple tastes: its not about the money at all…
๐
@Big Fish (Comment 174) : Yeh but it’s a nice addition. ๐
I was lying thru my teef… ๐ณ
yeah, 3 stars!!! thanx Rob…
now where do i turn this babies in for cash??? ๐ ๐
Man said to wife: “Right you sexy thing, upstairs now”
She looked at him and said: “Ooh, you kinky ba$tard”
He said: “No, seriously, the rugby’s starting, now f*#k offโ
@VanWilder (Comment 177) : we’re gonna launch tshirts and stuff… you”ll get one.
@robdylan (Comment 179) :
I’ll take a medium t-shirt ok?? ๐ ๐
@Big Fish (Comment 176) : About the MBA? Why? ๐
@wpw (Comment 180) : Howzit boeta. ๐
@wpw (Comment 180) : is this for your wife ?
on the avatar you look XXL ๐
@wpw (Comment 180) :
For Daniel-son??? or for your mascot? ๐
@wpw (Comment 180) :
I thought the days of WP fans wearing TIGHT t-shirts and hotpants stopped in the mid eighties?
@KSA Shark ยฉ (Comment 185) :
O gawd! Now I cannot get that picture out of my head!!! ๐ ๐
@klempie:
No man: about not doing it for filthy lucre. I would NEVER put myself through this simply for the love of the game. Its all about the Benjamins! ๐
Let’s hope I don’t end up disapponted. ๐
@Ice (Comment 178) : WAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
@Big Fish (Comment 187) : Fair play. ๐
@robdylan (Comment 179) : great, THANX!!
@Ice (Comment 186) : hey guys, come on… stop now!! wpw will go on a diet once the wp win against the sharks…
@VanWilder (Comment 191) :
Exactly…. he will never fit into a size 32 again!!!
@rekinek (back to rugby) (Comment 183) :
Oh no you didnt!! ๐ฟ
I met a fairy today who granted me one wish. “I want to live forever,” I said.
“Sorry,” said the fairy, but I am not allowed to grant that type of wish.
“Fine,” I said,, “Then I want to die when the Lions win the Currie Cup.”
“You crafty bastard!” said the fairy
@Big Fish (Comment 187) : can be noisy and ask how MBA will help ? not many attorneys go that route.
@wpw (Comment 193) : ๐ณ ๐ณ did I spoil a surprise for her ?
@VanWilder (Comment 194) :
Klempie, you know that the biggest and the smallest supporters on this site are busy making your name gat on the Sharksworld live thread? ๐
@rekinek (back to rugby) (Comment 183) : that avatar pic was taken way back in high school… ๐
@Ice (Comment 192) : I’m actually really stoked that I now DO fit into 32s again. First time since high school.
I’m in better shape now than I was at 17!
@Rekinek
I am no longer in practise: a corporate monkey now.
@robdylan (Comment 200) :
So am I, and I was not really out of shape @ 17 either..
But then again – you are a Sharks supporter – you are not a quiter!! You dont give in to the mere thought of food! ๐ ๐
@robdylan (Comment 200) : Ah so you’re running again? ๐
@Big Fish (Comment 198) : ๐ฏ
@Big Fish (Comment 198) :
who is the biggest and smallest?
@Ice (Comment 205) : the biggest is easy
@VanWilder (Comment 199) :
@Big Fish (Comment 201) : aha.
@Ice (Comment 178) :
