Two weeks for Ranger

Written by Rob Otto (robdylan)

Posted in :Original Content, Super Rugby on 12 Mar 2012 at 10:05
Tagged with : , , , , , ,

Blues back Rene Ranger has entered a guilty plea to the charge of a dangerous tackle in the final minute of his side’s weekend win over the Bulls.

In line with the new SANZAR disciplinary regulations, Ranger’s plea was considered in mitigation of sentence and as a result he has received only a tw-week ban after an offence deemed worthy of a red card.

Judicial Officer Mike Herron’s findings are below:

“Rene Ranger was cited for a late and dangerous tackle in the final moments of the Blues v Bulls match on Sunday 11 March 2012. After following the Duty JO process with the player and his coach, the player accepted my indication of penalty of two weeks’ suspension. Accordingly, Rene Ranger is suspended from all forms of the game for two weeks, to and including Sunday 25 March 2012 (covering the two scheduled matches on 17 and 23 March).

My reasons in summary are:

I reviewed the footage on the intranet and the live feed. I discussed the same with the player and coach (and later discussed the case with his counsel Mr Weyers). It shows Rene Ranger diving towards the other player, who was also diving to score the try, and ultimately hitting the player with his shoulder on the back of the player. At that point, the tackle did not involve his arms and was late. A careful review of at least one angle shows that Ranger initially was attempting to use his arms and appeared to launch towards the other player while that other player was in the air. In my view, Ranger was initially attempting to tackle the Bulls number 11 but had to pull out as the Bulls player was too close to the ground. The result was that Ranger’s arms were not used in the tackle. In my view the tackle was reckless, and late (but this was a dynamic and very fast moving situation). I accept Ranger’s account that he was attempting a legitimate tackle and had no intention of injuring the Bulls player. The referee and AR’s report reflect a similar impression as the citing commissioner, although concentrate on the lack of attempt to use the arms and the use of the shoulder. I note that the player was issued a yellow card and a white card was also issued. I have an informal medical report to the effect that the Bulls player has injured ligaments in his left shoulder and has bruised ribs on the left side (I am unable to determine whether these resulted from the tackle although that is a fair inference). The Bulls player walked off the pitch with the other players and I am told that the players met after the game and the relationship between the teams was amicable. I find that the tackle was late and dangerous (as cited). I am satisfied that the player did not intend to carry out such a tackle and the footage confirms his original intention. I find, however, that he was reckless as to the safety of the tackle. In all the circumstances, I find that the tackle was lower end in terms of the entry point for Law 10.4(e). That gives an entry point of two weeks. The player has one previous disciplinary matter of a similar nature. By coincidence it occurred at the same ground against the same team in 2009. He received a one week sanction. He does not, therefore, have the benefit of a completely clean record. The effect on the Bulls player and the need for general deterrence provide some aggravation, albeit modest in the circumstances. The player was contrite and sensibly accepted that the tackle was dangerous. He and the coach put forward an explanation, which was supported by the footage. Rene Ranger is a respected member of the Blues and is held in high regard both on and off the field. He deserves full credit for his attitude and for his early plea of guilty. In summary, I find that the aggravating factors (described) are counterbalanced by the mitigating factors and they are approximately equivalent. I am left with the entry point of two weeks and that is the sanction I impose. Accordingly, Rene Ranger is suspended from all forms of the game for two weeks, to and including Sunday 25 March 2012 (covering the two scheduled matches on 17 and 23 March).”


  • This its a stupid citing. He tried everything to stop Basson. Granted, no arms were used, but that’s understandable going full tilt and diving. Bit of a silly one to me.

  • Comment 1, posted at 12.03.12 10:11:21 by PTAShark Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author
  • @PTAShark (Comment 1) : completely disagree… seems like you’re saying that any and all means are excusable as long as your intention is to stop another player scoring…

    Why didn’t he go in with a flying kick to the head instead? :mrgreen:

  • Comment 2, posted at 12.03.12 10:17:04 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • @robdylan (Comment 2) : Yep got to agree; even though he was going full tilt and the thought process is nothing but get there and stop him; the execution was a bit of a shocker… Never like guys diving in on diving players… Pieter Muller was known for that, never enjoyed it. Once a player is over the line… You should only rugby tackle him… Not MMA him…

  • Comment 3, posted at 12.03.12 10:23:36 by DarkDestroyer Reply

  • @PTAShark (Comment 1) :

    He was never going to get to him on time, and granted he tried, he should have pulled out and rather stayed on his feet..

  • Comment 4, posted at 12.03.12 10:27:17 by Richard Ferguson Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
    Richard Ferguson
  • @robdylan (Comment 2) : It’s about time they came down harshly on this. Most players get injured while scoring tries as a result of players diving on them, even if there’s no chance of stopping the try. Good result.

  • Comment 5, posted at 12.03.12 10:37:56 by StevieS Reply
  • Statistically a diving player is exceptionally difficult to stop legally, which is exactly why players dive in pressure moments. We have seen some incredible defense on diving players in the past sure, but this oke was over the line and it was absolutely silly to make any attempt whatsoever, as any attempt wouldve been illegal in that position.

    Fair call, 2 weeks.

  • Comment 6, posted at 12.03.12 10:47:28 by DarkDestroyer Reply

  • I think he was aiming to shove him out. His timing was a bit off and he ended up on Basson’s back.

    I like it that there are wings out there who’ll put their bodies on the line to try defend the try line. I hate it when the oke gives up on the chase/tackle.

  • Comment 7, posted at 12.03.12 10:55:51 by PTAShark Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.