robdylan

Sharks tour squad named


Written by Rob Otto (robdylan)

Posted in :Original Content, Sharks, Super Rugby on 24 Apr 2014 at 12:09
Tagged with : , , , , , , , ,

Jake White has named a 27-man squad for the Cell C Sharks overseas tour, comprising matches against the Rebels, Brumbies, Crusaders and Blues.

White has gone for a 15-12 split between forwards and backs – an interesting choice which leaves him short of a third hooker in the tour party, although Wiehahn Herbst has been included as a fifth prop.

Tera Mtembu joins Odwa Ndungane, Fred Zeilinga and Cobus Reinach in being named as members of the group, despite battling with fitness concerns. The feeling is that the quartet will recover sufficiently to play a role on tour. Of those to see recent match day action, only Stefan Ungerer and Jaco van Tonder miss out, although both must surely be on standby given the number of injuries still in the system.

Sharks tour squad:

Props (5): Beast Mtawarira, Dale Chadwick, Jannie du Plessis, Lourens Adriaanse, Wiehahn Herbst
Hookers (2): Bismarck du Plessis, Kyle Cooper
Locks (3): Willem Alberts, Stephan Lewies, Etienne Oosthuizen
Loose forwards (5): Marcell Coetzee, Keegan Daniel, Jean Deysel, Tera Mtembu, Ryan Kankowski
Scrumhalves (2): Charl McLeod, Cobus Reinach
Flyhalves (2): Fred Zeilinga, Tim Swiel
Centres (4): Frans Steyn, Paul Jordaan, Heimar Williams, S’bura Sithole
Outside backs (4): JP Pietersen, Odwa Ndungane, SP Marais, Lwazi Mvovo


31 Comments

  • Heimar is in!! Happy days! But looking quickly I can’t see who was left out? Hadebe?

  • Comment 1, posted at 24.04.14 12:14:00 by Another Nick Reply
    Another Nick
     
  • @Another Nick (Comment 1) :

    Hadebe and Rob had a sixth prop replacement, if I’m not mistaken. Therefore Keegan and Tera can tour, instead of just one of them, as well as Heimar.

    Good squad this. Hope the boys with injuries recover soon.

  • Comment 2, posted at 24.04.14 12:16:34 by Maria Delport Reply
     
  • @Maria Delport (Comment 2) : no, I have Thomas du Toit as fifth prop… the only real change to what I put forward is Herbst for du Toit, Mtembu for Marais and then Williams included instead of a spare hooker.

    Very risky to tour without a spare hooker.

  • Comment 3, posted at 24.04.14 12:19:52 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Maria Delport (Comment 2) : I’m happy with this squad. Also interesting to see Wors there.. Guess he will be back-up if Jannie or Lourens pick up an injury. Or maybe when we get to see some rotation within the squad.

  • Comment 4, posted at 24.04.14 12:21:17 by Another Nick Reply

    Another Nick
     
  • Strong Squad. Only two hookers ?
    My favourite topic only two locks and a flank/lock. I guess Jean can play lock if he has to. Stephan has really played well but he is the only 5 in the squad. Willem looks tired and nobody seems to be convinced by Jake’s liability boy Etienne. How , who and when will Willem and Stephan be rested? High risk decision! What is Peet’s future ?

  • Comment 5, posted at 24.04.14 12:39:35 by Observer Reply

    Observer
     
  • Like the look of this squad and lets hope that those that are still on the road to recovery heal in time to make a meaningful contribution on tour, and also that no more injuries are picked up in tomorrow’s game!

  • Comment 6, posted at 24.04.14 12:44:34 by stevovo Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    stevovo
     
  • @Observer (Comment 5) : I’ve “observed” that you’re not much of an Oosthuizen fan 🙂

  • Comment 7, posted at 24.04.14 12:45:47 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Observer (Comment 5) : I’ve seen a few people mention that Alberts looks tired, but I don’t see it. Remember, he is in a different position where you won’t see him as often.

  • Comment 8, posted at 24.04.14 12:56:02 by MysticShark Reply
    Competition Winner
    MysticShark
     
  • @Observer (Comment 5) : I am starting to lose count how many articles you have posted in that have just been negative Oosthuizen comments, we get it you don’t like the guy….

  • Comment 9, posted at 24.04.14 13:11:02 by Seth101 Reply
    Valued Sharksworld Supporter Author
    Nostraseth
     
  • @robdylan (Comment 7) : Good Observation ! Do you agree with the risk, depth and rotation problem with locks ? especially 5 lock ?

  • Comment 10, posted at 24.04.14 13:41:15 by Observer Reply

    Observer
     
  • @Seth101 (Comment 9) : Opinion based on what I have seen and compared to a good player like Peet. My opinion stands 😆

  • Comment 11, posted at 24.04.14 13:45:52 by Observer Reply

    Observer
     
  • @Observer (Comment 10) : no, not at all…. I think Jake is being somewhat remiss in overlooking Marais and even Wentzel, who could do a great job as a stopgap.

    Am I going to turn it into a personal crusade against Oosthuizen, though? No.

    I think you’d find that your views regarding the usage of lock would find a lot more support if they weren’t always prefaced with an ad hominem attack against a particular player.

  • Comment 12, posted at 24.04.14 13:46:54 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • Freedom of expression on your site ? 😀 Point taken but a bit frustrated because other players get opportunities, and a guy like Peet(In a playing position where we are at risk) out of the mix. The risk remains however you phrase it! 😡

  • Comment 13, posted at 24.04.14 13:54:09 by Observer Reply

    Observer
     
  • @Observer (Comment 13) : Do I agree that Oosthuizen is getting preferential treatment? Yes. Do I agree that there are good locks who should be given chances? Yes. But I don’t agree with a continues barrage of insult against a single player, the problem is not his, and he has hardly been given enough time to show if what Jake sees in him is warranted.

  • Comment 14, posted at 24.04.14 14:02:46 by Seth101 Reply
    Valued Sharksworld Supporter Author
    Nostraseth
     
  • With only being able to name 27 players JW cant afford the luxury of taking too much depth in each position, hence no 3 hookers etc. I can bet you the next in line are being told to be packed and ready at a moments notice however.

  • Comment 15, posted at 24.04.14 14:14:52 by SheldonK Reply

    SheldonK
     
  • I am mostly worried about the one and a half scrumhalves in the squad (seeing as Reinach is still officially injured).

    Someone mentioned that Fred can deputize at scrumhalf?

  • Comment 16, posted at 24.04.14 14:27:48 by Bokhoring Reply
    Administrator
    Bokhoring
     
  • @Bokhoring (Comment 16) : he’s played scrumhalf at age-group level.

    Less worried about a third 9 than I am about a third hooker.

  • Comment 17, posted at 24.04.14 14:32:58 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • Squad with minimal disruption to the Vodacom Cup side, who themselves have a job to do.

  • Comment 18, posted at 24.04.14 14:55:19 by Salmonoid the Subtle Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Salmonoid the Subtle (Comment 18) : still a tough one for them…

    both their flyhalves gone.

    their starting tighthead gone.

    plus this week makes 4 games in the SR 23 for Ungerer, which rules him out for the VC knockouts.

  • Comment 19, posted at 24.04.14 15:33:40 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @robdylan (Comment 19) : Thats a bummer for Ungerer considering that he has hardly got onto the field.

  • Comment 20, posted at 24.04.14 16:16:29 by Salmonoid the Subtle Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
     
  • @Observer (Comment 5) : Jean a 192 cm lock! Gee who is going to lift him the required 20 inches??

  • Comment 21, posted at 24.04.14 17:08:38 by KingCheetah Reply

    KingCheetah
     
  • @KingCheetah (Comment 21) : he’s no shorter than Alberts

  • Comment 22, posted at 24.04.14 17:09:11 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • @Salmonoid the Subtle (Comment 20) : I agree with you – horribly unfair

  • Comment 23, posted at 24.04.14 17:09:24 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
    robdylan
     
  • Really swak for poor ungerer he’s really dealt a heartbreaking blow here. Oh well like big fish always says… “In white we trust”?

  • Comment 24, posted at 24.04.14 17:36:22 by Stiko85 Reply

    Stiko85
     
  • @robdylan (Comment 17) : the lack of a third hooker is a huge concern, unless maybe one of the props can play as reserve hooker if a late injury happens ? Just hope and pray for no injuries to the two touring hookers!!

  • Comment 25, posted at 24.04.14 17:43:31 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
    JD
     
  • @KingCheetah (Comment 21) : you think anyone is brave enough to try and take a lineout ball from Jean “the Hulk” Deysel?!?!?!

  • Comment 26, posted at 24.04.14 17:46:20 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
    JD
     
  • @Observer (Comment 5) : I must say, this single-minded, obsessive character-assassination quest of yours is tiresome, uncalled for, and not the the of thing that is tolerated around here. Excepting of course if the character in question is Marius Joubert :mrgreen:

  • Comment 27, posted at 24.04.14 18:09:13 by Culling Song Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author
    Culling Song
     
  • I personally rate oosthuizen … hes played off the bench which has not favored him but he is an exeptionally strong scrummager and he hits a lot of rucks. Locks that dont give away penalties in the loose are not competing for the ball :p

  • Comment 28, posted at 24.04.14 18:30:07 by byron Reply

    byron
     
  • What is going on with Botes?

  • Comment 29, posted at 24.04.14 22:27:28 by Dancing Bear Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Dancing Bear
     
  • Jake should send Hadebe on a paid for Australiasian trip next week. The guy could really use the break :mrgreen:

  • Comment 30, posted at 25.04.14 00:05:02 by vanmartin Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author
    vanmartin
     
  • Friday Funny:

    I just noticed that after dropping from 4 th to 10 th on the log, the poor Lions have to face the Chiefs in Hamilton next week!

  • Comment 31, posted at 25.04.14 08:44:09 by Original Pierre Reply
    Author
    Original Pierre
     

Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.