Sharks player ratings v Highlanders

Written by Rob Otto (robdylan)

Posted in :Original Content, Sharks, Super Rugby on 28 Apr 2014 at 09:34
Tagged with : , , ,

Avert your eyes, fans (and players especially!) because this isn’t going to be pretty.

Remember that the reason for doing these is not to slate individuals, nor to start a flame war, but simply to give my completely subjective view of how the individuals did relative to the team performance. That team performance, by the way, was the worst we’ve seen this season, barely scraping along between 4 and 5 out of 10.

1) Beast Mtawarira. There were some good scrums and a decent carry or two. The forwards collectively failed to fire, but Beast certainly wasn’t the worst of them. 5/10
2) Kyle Cooper. A big ask in his first start of the year, after enjoying literally no game time for over two months. Cooper did the basics well and his work rate remained high. Unfortunately, made no progress with ball in hand. 6/10
3) Jannie du Plessis. Scrummed very well while he was on the park and maintained his discipline; however, ball skills are a big concern, and that moment when he somehow knocked the ball on in the middle of a maul kind of summed up the Sharks’ day. 5/10
4) Etienne Oosthuizen. One of very few positives from this dire display was Oosthuizen’s first start. He looked busy, robust and aggressive, without giving away unnecessary penalties. Perhaps worth another look for Friday? 6/10
5) Stephan Lewies. Worked well at lineout time, but otherwise disappeared into the mire a little. We mustn’t forget how young he is, though. 5/10
6) Marcell Coetzee. A valiant, battling effort as always, but the Sharks simply weren’t in the game and Marcell lacked the variation in his game to do anything to reverse that. 6/10
7) Willem Alberts. You’ll not see a worse performance from this big man in a long time – which is a comfort of sorts. The heavily-marked Alberts has battled to make yards on attack all season and Friday was no different – the difference here, though, was that his usually bone crunching tackles far too often hit turf instead of opponent. 4/10
8) Keegan Daniel. Quite simply disappeared in his 100th match. In a game when the Sharks needed leaders, Daniel was conspicuous by his absence. 4/10

9) Charl McLeod. A penchant for individualism meant the 11th-hour captain was too often missing in action when there was a primary duty to be done. Not the worst performer on the night, but certainly far from his best. 5/10
10) Tim Swiel. A young player needs the cool heads around him to calm and guide. That simply didn’t happen for Tim and coupled with the fact that he’s being forced into a game that doesn’t seem a natural fit for his talents, he battled to assert himself. That said, he emerged as the weekend’s top points scorer and it certainly wasn’t him missing all those tackles in the backline. 6/10
11) S’bura Sithole. We didn’t see him at all in 25 minutes, before injury curtailed his participation. You have to give Jake one thing – this guy looks a lot better and gets a lot more involved when he’s playing centre. 4/10
12) Frans Steyn. Repeating what I said above – on a day when the Sharks needed leaders, none stood up. Steyn’s individual skills looked a pale shadow of what the Highlanders brought to the party and his decision-making on attack was just not there. 4/10
13) Paul Jordaan. Looked like a player who has been rushed back in after a month on the sidelines. Oh, that’s right… 4/10
14) JP Pietersen. Left his hands in Japan, it seems. I’m not a fan of these split deals because JP has come back a poor imitation of the lean, mean try machine that we are used to. For a primary finisher in the side (and a 100 capper) to be unable to catch the ball is just inexcusable. 3/10
15) Lwazi Mvovo. Very predictable on attack and outgunned in the tactical kicking game. Hard to really rate him purely as a fullback since he was shifted to wing so early in the game. 4/10

16) Franco Marais. Pulled right in as a late replacement and did very well in his debut. There are a lot of reasons for the Sharks losing this game, but the energy and enthusiasm of the young hooker certainly wasn’t one of them. 7/10
17) Dale Chadwick. Another good cameo, with a superb break down the right flank showing speed and explosiveness that belie the number on his back. 6/10
18) Lourens Adriaanse. Very quickly joined the general malaise and disappeared into a poor overall pack effort. 5/10
19) Tera Mtembu. Another player who’s been out for a while and took too long to get into the game. 5/10
20) Ryan Kankowski. Was introduced too late and had no impact on proceedings. 5/10
21) Stefan Ungerer. Only had 9 minutes, which is not enough on which to rate him. He looked very sharp, though, with clean crisp service.
22) Heimar Williams. Hard to rate a player who never saw the ball, but Heimar unfortunately did little to change the Sharks’ fate, despite having a good 25 minutes in which to do so. 5/10
23) SP Marais. Predictable on attack, shaky on defence – simply not a good outing for SP. Loses an extra point for losing his rag with a young teammate. 3/10


  • Yip pretty accurate, although I’d deduct another point from JPP for buggering three bleddie tries which should have been easy finishers for him mxm. The only good gem coming out of that game for me was franco marais, I’d love to see him on the field again great first scrum for the boytjie.

  • Comment 1, posted at 28.04.14 09:46:09 by Stiko85 Reply
  • Shame Rob, this must have been painful. 😐

    I want to see more of Ungerer, and whether he has the ability to give that kind of crisp fast service for an entire game.

    Give him at least 20mins off the bench this week to see what he’s made of.

    McLeod has returned to his form of old, where he seems to think that he is irreplaceable….maybe he’s easing himself into the slow low quality player the Japanese season tend to thrive/survive on.

    Agree with you Rob, these split Japanese seasons are not working…the players return at half the quality they went and they seem to worsen with each season that they are away.

  • Comment 2, posted at 28.04.14 09:48:10 by FireTheLooser Reply
  • @FireTheLooser (Comment 2) : Ungerer isn’t on tour, so we won’t see him again

  • Comment 3, posted at 28.04.14 09:54:51 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • interesting that Ungerer and Marais – the two who knew they weren’t touring regardless of what happened – were the guys who put in the best performances?

    That psychological fear of picking up an injury ahead of the tour is surely a big factor that contributed to this mess.

  • Comment 4, posted at 28.04.14 09:56:46 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • Swiel gets a 6????? He’s Shit!!!!

  • Comment 5, posted at 28.04.14 09:59:17 by Seth101 Reply
    Valued Sharksworld Supporter Author
  • Can’t wait for some Reinach X factor! Fred is the man for our current gameplan.

  • Comment 6, posted at 28.04.14 09:59:36 by uShaka Reply

  • @Seth101 (Comment 5) : I think it’s pretty obvious to everyone that the gameplan doesn’t really suit his play. The boy has talent.

  • Comment 7, posted at 28.04.14 10:02:33 by uShaka Reply

  • @uShaka (Comment 7) : Its got nothing to do with the game play. A good player is able to slot into what ever is asked of him (Lambie for the boke). Its more then that tho, he has the inability to command and set the back line, he can not create play when needed and seems to be way to prone to crumbling under pressure. It is a flyhalfs job first and foremost to command the backline (the 12 is there to create play if needed) which Swiel can not do at all.

  • Comment 8, posted at 28.04.14 10:05:40 by Seth101 Reply
    Valued Sharksworld Supporter Author
  • @Seth101 (Comment 8) : a versatile player you mean, it comes with age and experience hence Lambie and Steyn, look at what a change of gameplan did to Elton Jantjies when he moved to the Stormers. Tim was brought up here because of his enterprising play now he finds himself having to the plug gap left by Lambie whom the coach was clearly banking on occupying the 10 jersey for the most part of the season.

  • Comment 9, posted at 28.04.14 10:17:01 by uShaka Reply

  • @robdylan (Comment 4) : that makes some sense as it seemed like the guys were, for just this game, shying away from really physical game we normally play. At first I put it down to the lack of Bis and Deysel not leading from the front.

  • Comment 10, posted at 28.04.14 10:18:16 by gregkaos Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author
  • @robdylan (Comment 3) : That’s disappointing.

    Will Reinach be ready by Friday?

    Any news on our last second injuries, or were they merely wrapped in precautionary cotton wool for possible injuries on Friday?

  • Comment 11, posted at 28.04.14 10:21:47 by FireTheLooser Reply

  • @robdylan (Comment 4) : any news on why Bis and Deysel were withdrawn last minute? Legit issue or cotton wool before tour?

  • Comment 12, posted at 28.04.14 10:23:47 by gregkaos Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author
  • @FireTheLooser (Comment 11) : beat me to it! 🙂

  • Comment 13, posted at 28.04.14 10:24:32 by gregkaos Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author
  • @gregkaos (Comment 13) : 😉

  • Comment 14, posted at 28.04.14 10:26:13 by FireTheLooser Reply

  • it’s hard to be sure, because nobody is really saying anything.

    I believe the only player who had to be cleared to tour was S’bura and he came through his assessment ok.

    Last minute change to the tour group saw Thomas du Toit travel ahead of Wiehahn Herbst, but I have no idea what that was about.

  • Comment 15, posted at 28.04.14 10:29:01 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • Conference derbies are the main cause of this wide-spread inclination to injury , teams bring their A game to a derby, regardless.

  • Comment 16, posted at 28.04.14 10:29:52 by uShaka Reply

  • @robdylan (Comment 15) : the lack of concern surrounding a potential injury to Bismarck suggests that it is cotton wool treatment to me at least. Using the awesome power of hindsight , would have been a good time to have put in a starting team of as many non touring players as possible.

  • Comment 17, posted at 28.04.14 10:41:24 by gregkaos Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author
  • @gregkaos (Comment 17) : yeah – I think Bissie was still feeling the effects of his knock against the Cheetahs, so they opted not to risk him. Reckon if it had been a final, he would have played

  • Comment 18, posted at 28.04.14 10:46:00 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • 3/10 for Charl …. he was really slow andkicked everything badly

  • Comment 19, posted at 28.04.14 10:47:23 by byron Reply

  • yeah look, if we are completely honest, we should probably just give everyone 0/10 and move on.

    But that doesn’t seem very constructive.

  • Comment 20, posted at 28.04.14 10:54:14 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • Agree on all except 9 and 10. Ungerer needs to go on tour.Very valid point on Japan,and do the Sharks have a Kop dr and backline coach,cause if they do those two better start earning their keep

  • Comment 21, posted at 28.04.14 10:54:17 by benji Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
  • @robdylan (Comment 20) : lol I’m inclined to agree with u. Give them a 0/10 and let’s write this week off. Throw it as far away from our minds as possible. Sincerely hope the “cotton wool” theory is right. Can’t see us facing the tour down under without bissie and jean. We gonna get murdered in every game. I’m not even feeling confident about the rebels game eish. And the blues pretty much proved that they are ready to murder any “favorites” coming to aukland. We stand a better chance beating the saders then we do the blues on tour. Lol do we still say, “in white we trust”? He better cough up that few season’s worth of experience with the dumbies and make it impossible for mogg and co to beat us jong.

  • Comment 22, posted at 28.04.14 11:26:40 by Stiko85 Reply

  • Well guys, before Black Friday, or Friday of Pain, I had some hope for us against the Rebels and maybe to a lesser extend the blues, but right now I think we might see a replay of the bulls tour.

    If you can`t take care of business against the Highlanders, At Home, you can`t really expect miracles away from home, where we only have a 50% winning record even in SA . . .

    But on a positive note : I`m still alive on LMS !

  • Comment 23, posted at 28.04.14 12:40:48 by Original Pierre Reply
    Original Pierre
  • Why is Lewies age mentioned? He is 22? Etzebeth is only two months older. Lood de Jager is younger, and Steph-du Toit and Willemse about the same age.

    Inexperienced at this level might have been a better mitigating factor, but not how young he is,

  • Comment 24, posted at 28.04.14 12:50:18 by KingCheetah Reply

  • @KingCheetah (Comment 24) : that’s what I meant… young in terms of experience.

  • Comment 25, posted at 28.04.14 12:51:51 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • @robdylan (Comment 25) : Ah, cool. Looks a good prospect. We actually have good locks coming through the system. Eben can start, and Lood can come off the bench. PSDT can play 5, or they can play both Lood and Eben together. Paul Willemse, Lewies and Ruan Botha can also push for higher honours.

  • Comment 26, posted at 28.04.14 13:31:55 by KingCheetah Reply

  • You forgot to give the coaching staff a number.

  • Comment 27, posted at 28.04.14 13:50:06 by VinChainSaw Reply
  • @VinChainSaw (Comment 27) : fokken -10

  • Comment 28, posted at 28.04.14 14:10:12 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • @robdylan;not nice language (comment 28). then I would like to know: who decide what the players ratings are? A panel of some sorts or is it a one sided affair?

  • Comment 29, posted at 28.04.14 14:22:09 by Coco Reply

  • @robdylan (Comment 28) : thanx Rob I’m sure it was painful to watch it all over again. Must agree with your ratings although Dale did surprised me, maybe time to give him and Adriaanse a start.

  • Comment 30, posted at 28.04.14 14:26:31 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @Coco (Comment 29) : Go reread the second sentence of the article.

  • Comment 31, posted at 28.04.14 14:38:36 by vanmartin Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld Author
  • @robdylan (Comment 28) :

    Lol. Was thinking the same thing.
    How is it that you end up in a position where you’re juggling players in the two most important positions, flyhalf and hooker?
    Its a bloody disgrace.

  • Comment 32, posted at 28.04.14 15:02:40 by VinChainSaw Reply
  • BTW – Burden had a screamer over the weekend, playing for probably the most star-studded club side to ever have graced the game.

  • Comment 33, posted at 28.04.14 15:04:37 by VinChainSaw Reply
  • @VinChainSaw (Comment 33) : I am amazed and chuffed in equal parts that Burden managed to start for that side

  • Comment 34, posted at 28.04.14 15:42:08 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • @robdylan (Comment 34) :

    Yeah, i was somewhat surprised. But he acquitted himself well.
    Cant decide if he got a lucky break and just took it with both hands, or whether a familiar tale is again playing itself out in the front row in Durbs.

  • Comment 35, posted at 28.04.14 16:10:54 by VinChainSaw Reply
  • @VinChainSaw (Comment 35) : there really wasn’t much in Craig’s play to suggest to me that he was seriously underrated as a hooker in SA….

    And I really like the guy.

  • Comment 36, posted at 28.04.14 16:18:23 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • @Coco (Comment 29) : sorry. I don’t swear often, really I don’t.

    And no, the ratings are done by me.

  • Comment 37, posted at 28.04.14 16:22:13 by robdylan Reply
    Competition Winner Administrator
  • Beast was by far the standout and therefore should have the highest rating.

    Frans has failed to impress this season to be honest, he needs to bring more to the party at 12

    What has happened to SP Marais, looked a Bok in the making a few months back and now looks awful.

    JP has been massively disappointing as well

  • Comment 38, posted at 28.04.14 16:55:15 by Saffex Reply

  • Fred Michalak come back. Always looked like our backline had a coach when he was playing, Pat could not get our backline to play like him.

    I know he can have shockers lol.

  • Comment 39, posted at 28.04.14 17:19:41 by Honey Badger Reply

    Honey Badger
  • @Saffex (Comment 38) : Have to agree about Beast. That same performance in a winning game would have got him at least a 7 from me.

  • Comment 40, posted at 28.04.14 18:06:53 by Salmonoid the Subtle Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
  • Keegan was disappointing BUT why was he not given the captaincy. Expecting him to be the leader when his coach clearly does not feel he is up to it must have hurt and been a slap in the face, especially in his 100th. He would have been the obvious captain for the day.

  • Comment 41, posted at 28.04.14 18:11:35 by Salmonoid the Subtle Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
  • @Saffex; maybe one must try to dig deeper into the fact that a player “suddenly looks awful”. Could be loads of reasons for that. Most of the players flourished under Brendan Venter and we won the CC; why??? For starters I think too many players are playing out of their normal positions.

  • Comment 42, posted at 28.04.14 18:19:43 by Coco Reply

  • @Coco (Comment 42) : If you believe that the radical change in tic tacs in the CC final,after being trounced twice by the netball palyers was a BV brainwave,you dreaming

  • Comment 43, posted at 28.04.14 18:41:12 by benji Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
  • @robdylan (Comment 34) : @VinChainSaw (Comment 33) : Burden is really playing some quality rugby at the moment, seems to have his line out problems sorted and does not look one inch out of place in that star studded team.

  • Comment 44, posted at 28.04.14 19:18:49 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @Honey Badger (Comment 39) : and to think a player of that quality can’t even crack the Toulon match 23. Hell pity the Sharks can’t make loan arrangement with them.

  • Comment 45, posted at 28.04.14 19:22:28 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @Salmonoid the Subtle (Comment 41) : good point think he’s a way better leader than Charl and should have been captain.

  • Comment 46, posted at 28.04.14 19:24:15 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @robdylan (Comment 36) : only problem with Craig was line outs, rest of his play was always good. Always looked like a super guy to have in the team and I’m very glad for Craig that he’s making it in Toulon he totally deserves it!!!!!

  • Comment 47, posted at 28.04.14 19:35:16 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @robdylan (Comment 37) : @Coco (Comment 29) : he’s not like the rest of us he only swears when it is really needed, and as for the ratings I think he’s the only one willing to relive a performance like Friday.

  • Comment 48, posted at 28.04.14 22:21:17 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @JD (Comment 48) : ya shame man, you kinda have to give rob huge credit for that. And since reading sharksworld I rate rob, vanmartin and ferguson (richard) as the gentlemen on this site so if rob swears then u have to understand last week was horrible. So anyway. Rob, how about u pull some strings by your boy JS and find out what’s happening injury wise? The wait for a proper release is killing me (mainly coz I’m worried that bissie and jean might be injured or something).

  • Comment 49, posted at 28.04.14 23:42:12 by Stiko85 Reply

  • @Stiko85 (Comment 49) : yes and I’m the local hooligan 😈

  • Comment 50, posted at 29.04.14 08:08:41 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • Keegan didn’t keep quiet. He “overruled” McLeod, as well as Steyn on more than one occasion.

    I don’t think it’s a good idea to play Keegan when Bissie is not captain. He felt inclined to step in and quite forcefully give his opinion on what should be done.

    Particularly when the yellow was given to the Highlanders and McLeod and Steyn had decided on going for the line and Keegan argued with them until they changed their minds. None of it was shown on TV.

    That was the wrong decision we should have built on the momentum we had at that stage.

  • Comment 51, posted at 29.04.14 08:32:51 by Maria Delport Reply

  • After sitting behind the poles watching this game and then reading these comments im wondering exactly how many beers I did have as clearly I watched a different game if some of these comments are to go by. Yes the Sharks were poor BUT..their captain withdraws at the last minute as does one of their premier flanks. Mthembu barely passes a fitness test prior to the game but has to play off the bench as there nobody else. Jordaan and JPP still looked injured…altho JPPs hands were dreadful but it happens. Sithole’s in jury early on didnt help. So definitely not the ideal preparation. The Sharks lost this game because the Highlanders dominated the tackle and contact areas simple as that. The Sharks were forced to play off the back foot with scrappy ball hence the aimless kicking under pressure. These bad games happen…unfortunately you would prefer if they happened away and not at home but nothing you can do. What I must say though is that when Ungerer came on and with Steyn at 10 and Heimar at 12 the Sharks looked a lot better. And i personally think JW missed a trick not playing Botes on Sat- for those not at the game, he did warm up with the team but i think missed out as he played Mthembu instead.

  • Comment 52, posted at 29.04.14 08:38:29 by SheldonK Reply

  • Btw, the game could have been so much diffirent of that try had been allowed and Pyper saw the absolutely blatant, playing on the ground before the highlanders’ first try. I’m referring to Paul Jordaan carrying the ball into the tackle and the Highlanders prop diving onto Jordaan and ripping the ball from his hands. Pyper even says, no knock on, back of green.

    That should have been a penalty for us. Instead one bad kick (by a flank), a pass, a break, an off-load and a grubber later, and we’re one try down.

    I don’t understand why he would dissect our try, but not check if his “back of green”, maybe wasn’t a little weird in the first place.

    Anyway, the Sharks only played well for the first 20 minutes. We didn’t get any reward and once we were 3 tries down, it seemed panic kicked in.

  • Comment 53, posted at 29.04.14 08:47:58 by Maria Delport Reply

  • @Maria Delport (Comment 53) : Agreed if that try was allowed the course of the game could have been very different as Highlanders would have needed to chase the game so Sharks could have played territory and the try would have been a boost to the makeshift team

  • Comment 54, posted at 29.04.14 08:53:26 by SheldonK Reply

  • Oh and the passing was much worse than the catching. Sure JPP could have caught two balls close to the line, but with the one from Steyn he would have probably had to make some sort of turning maneuver, to catch the ball behind his shoulder and most probably would have been in a bad position and would not have been able to score anyway and with the one from Beast, he was tackled before he even hit the ground, so had he caught it, he would have had possession lying on his back.

    The worst catches of the day was Mvovo on halfway from a kick and Keegan Daniel, into space from a perfect SP Marais pass.

    The rest was the passing. McLeod and Frans Steyn beings some of the biggest culprits. Sure McLeod also passes quite a few clean passes during the match, but to many are to high, to low, to left or right.

    Steyn continues to pass these long passes, not only are they not well thought out (every time), but he hasn’t passed an accurate one since the first game this season. If you want to pass a long pass, it needs to still be straight and hard. Look at the Brumbies game, Jesse Mogg and Nick White has an excellent long pass. You can’t make a long pass that it loopy and behind your players and expect anything to come of it.

    I’m sorry but Nick Mallet is right, we need to work on our ball skills.

  • Comment 55, posted at 29.04.14 08:57:50 by Maria Delport Reply

  • @Maria Delport (Comment 53) : @SheldonK (Comment 54) : Be that as it may but once we got behind it was very clear that we had no idea on how to chase the game and to claw our way back into the game. Hopefully it was just one hell of a bad day at the office.

  • Comment 56, posted at 29.04.14 09:14:18 by Salmonoid the Subtle Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
    Salmonoid the Subtle
  • @SheldonK (Comment 54) : @Maria Delport (Comment 55) : don’t think only one or two players can be blamed for the loss, it was a so-so performance by a side with lots of injuries. Maybe the tour was on their mind before they left.

  • Comment 57, posted at 29.04.14 09:14:23 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @Salmonoid the Subtle (Comment 56) : I think any team with that many last min disruptions would find it difficult to chase the game. The Highlanders were playing well, its not like they were bad, far from it.

  • Comment 58, posted at 29.04.14 09:34:36 by SheldonK Reply

  • @JD (Comment 57) : No def not 1 player. You could see from the outset the team as a whole was a bit shell shocked. It didnt help that the Highlanders were playing good rugby as well. As I said, i think not playing Botes was a missed trick

  • Comment 59, posted at 29.04.14 09:37:40 by SheldonK Reply

  • @SheldonK (Comment 52) : next time let me organise you better seats,I agree with you that moment Ungerer came on with FS at 10 the Sharks attack started to look dangerous,but for me the was the disappearance of all structure after 10 min and the mindset after that try not allowed

  • Comment 60, posted at 29.04.14 09:47:02 by benji Reply
    Friend of Sharksworld
  • @benji (Comment 60) : Can you organise seats on the field next time? haha But i agree with you that the Sharks lacked shape throughout the game

  • Comment 61, posted at 29.04.14 09:58:10 by SheldonK Reply

  • I disagree with Beast getting a 5. At least he played with heart, probably made the only line break for the Sharks, and had a decent run that could have resulted in more.

  • Comment 62, posted at 29.04.14 10:15:10 by Bokhoring Reply
  • @Maria Delport (Comment 55) : Steyn is definitely overdoing the long passing. I recall a few times we had an overlap, and the long pass just snuffed out the opportunity by having all the defenders on the wing who caught the ball.

  • Comment 63, posted at 29.04.14 11:00:33 by Bokhoring Reply
  • @benji (Comment 60) : that was a huge problem. The Sharks lost their structures and then they will always struggle. Sharks need to stick to strugtured rugby not this free for all 7’s type.

  • Comment 64, posted at 29.04.14 11:00:52 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @JD (Comment 64) : It is almost like the team decided to show SA that they can play expansive rugby. I agree – they should have stuck to the “suffocate and pounce” game plan.

  • Comment 65, posted at 29.04.14 11:03:50 by Bokhoring Reply
  • @Bokhoring (Comment 65) : that’s correct stick to what’s working!!!!!!!!!!! Even with “suffocate and pounce” they created chances.

  • Comment 66, posted at 29.04.14 11:43:41 by JD Reply
    Friend of SharksworldCompetition Winner Administrator
  • @JD (Comment 57) :

    No, you can’t blame one or two players. I was just referring to specific problem areas of one or two players. Both these players unfortunately very experienced and expected to do better than they have. Specifically these two, in specifically the areas I mentioned.

  • Comment 67, posted at 29.04.14 15:07:01 by Maria Delport Reply

  • i wonder if the coaching staff reads some of this, some valid points. supporters are certainly educated.

  • Comment 68, posted at 30.04.14 23:15:15 by Gerhardt Reply


Add Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.